Difference between revisions of "User talk:Gwern"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(spam) |
(→Sysopping: rp) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::[[Special:CheckUser]]. No idea why there's a difference. Also [[Special:Specialpages]] is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC) |
::[[Special:CheckUser]]. No idea why there's a difference. Also [[Special:Specialpages]] is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | :::Dunno; the docs definitely say [[Special:Checkuser]], |
||
+ | :::[[Special:Specialpages]] is an old friend of mine; you get it when you go somewhere in the Special: namespace without an existing page, on the error message: 'You have requested an invalid special page, a list of valid special pages may be found at Special:Specialpages.' Our Special:Specialpages ''does not'' list Special:CheckUser, one reason I thought it was non-existent. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 02:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Spam == |
== Spam == |
Revision as of 02:56, 14 July 2010
Sysopping
Gwern, I have added you to the groups sysop and checkuser.
- Thanks. --Gwern 03:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ashley, is Checkuser installed? I tried Special:Checkuser which is where the MW docs say it should be, but that's an error. --Gwern 04:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Special:CheckUser. No idea why there's a difference. Also Special:Specialpages is useful but seems not to be linked anywhere. —Ashley Y 05:46, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
- Dunno; the docs definitely say Special:Checkuser,
- Special:Specialpages is an old friend of mine; you get it when you go somewhere in the Special: namespace without an existing page, on the error message: 'You have requested an invalid special page, a list of valid special pages may be found at Special:Specialpages.' Our Special:Specialpages does not list Special:CheckUser, one reason I thought it was non-existent. --Gwern 02:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Spam
Hello--just FYI, I noticed a bunch of spam accounts getting created today (User:Buyclomipramine, User:Buyzyvox and the like). I see from some other talk pages that you're already aware of the issue. The folks on #haskell seem to agree that a simple captcha might cut down on such nonsense. The current sign-up procedure is pretty easy, and I don't think it's too much to ask for new contributors to (say) "Use GHCI to find out the type of this Haskell expression" before creating an account :-) Best regards, Wapcaplet 17:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)