Talk:The Monad.Reader: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
ConradParker (talk | contribs) m (add headings for format, content) |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Pharm|Pharm]] 11:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC) (I have an ordinary 4:3 screen at home though. TBH the twosided thing doesn't bother me either way...) | --[[User:Pharm|Pharm]] 11:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC) (I have an ordinary 4:3 screen at home though. TBH the twosided thing doesn't bother me either way...) | ||
== The format == | |||
--[[User:Yang|Yang]] 17:04, 5 March 2007 (EST) | |||
Great publication, keep them coming! Please consider setting up an RSS/Atom/etc. feed for this. | |||
--[[User:raould|raould]] June 6 2007 | |||
Any chance of an HTML version (no matter how lame the results of an automated PDF2HTML might be)? | |||
== The content == | |||
--[[User:Mnislaih|Mnislaih]] 13:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | --[[User:Mnislaih|Mnislaih]] 13:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
Line 26: | Line 36: | ||
MonadState (Location, Integer)) | MonadState (Location, Integer)) | ||
</haskell> | </haskell> | ||
Revision as of 12:16, 10 September 2007
I'd welcome any feedback and discussion about The Monad.Reader. Don't like the class file? Love the articles? Shout it out! --WouterSwierstra 10:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The layout
I think the twosided should be dropped from the latex class file, that would make it a lot more pleasant to read on a screen.
--Twanvl 13:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Although those of use with wide screens quite like putting the pdf up in 2-page side-by-side mode in which the twosided option looks better!
--Pharm 11:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC) (I have an ordinary 4:3 screen at home though. TBH the twosided thing doesn't bother me either way...)
The format
--Yang 17:04, 5 March 2007 (EST) Great publication, keep them coming! Please consider setting up an RSS/Atom/etc. feed for this.
--raould June 6 2007 Any chance of an HTML version (no matter how lame the results of an automated PDF2HTML might be)?
The content
--Mnislaih 13:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Wow! This issue of TMR is excellent. I am loving the tutorial style of all the three articles. Right now I'm in section 2 of Russell's excellent assembler and found that the newtype definition for the AssemblyCodeMonad needs to be:
newtype AssemblyCodeMonad a =
AssemblyCodeMonad
(RWS [(Label,Location)]
[Either (Instruction Register) (Label,Location)]
(Location, Integer)
a)
deriving (Monad, MonadReader [(Label,Location)],
MonadWriter [Either (Instruction Register) (Label,Location)],
MonadState (Location, Integer))