Difference between revisions of "Not just Maybe"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Added a link to the Web Archive) |
(Inserted a probably better link) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | http://haskell.org/ |
+ | http://web.archive.org/web/20070614151632/http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/NotJustMaybe |
Note: Many now consider the fail method of Monad to be a failure, as it defaults to throwing an exception. Modern Haskell style tends towards using total functions wherever possible, and this idiom has come increasingly to be frowned upon. |
Note: Many now consider the fail method of Monad to be a failure, as it defaults to throwing an exception. Modern Haskell style tends towards using total functions wherever possible, and this idiom has come increasingly to be frowned upon. |
||
− | |||
− | A more recent page than the wikisnapshot can be found in the Web Archive: [http://web.archive.org/web/20070614151632/http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/NotJustMaybe] |
||
[[Category:Idioms]] |
[[Category:Idioms]] |
Latest revision as of 21:31, 4 June 2013
http://web.archive.org/web/20070614151632/http://www.haskell.org/hawiki/NotJustMaybe
Note: Many now consider the fail method of Monad to be a failure, as it defaults to throwing an exception. Modern Haskell style tends towards using total functions wherever possible, and this idiom has come increasingly to be frowned upon.