Difference between revisions of "Talk:All About Monads"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→ST monad not covered: new section) |
(→Why "===" instead of "=" on the html page?: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I was looking for a Haskell abstraction that would suit my needs (an FFI library), and I suspect that ST would be the one (need to elaborate), but since this article doesn't describe it, I had the impression that although the idea (of ST) is simple, there is no such standard thing in Haskell.--[[User:Imz|Imz]] ([[User talk:Imz|talk]]) 14:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
I was looking for a Haskell abstraction that would suit my needs (an FFI library), and I suspect that ST would be the one (need to elaborate), but since this article doesn't describe it, I had the impression that although the idea (of ST) is simple, there is no such standard thing in Haskell.--[[User:Imz|Imz]] ([[User talk:Imz|talk]]) 14:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Why "===" instead of "=" on the html page? == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Why "===" instead of "=" on the html page? |
||
| + | |||
| + | e.g. data Maybe a === Nothing | Just a |
||
| + | |||
| + | in the pdf file this is the correct "data Maybe a = Nothing | Just a" |
||
Latest revision as of 20:26, 1 November 2019
ST monad not covered
I was looking for a Haskell abstraction that would suit my needs (an FFI library), and I suspect that ST would be the one (need to elaborate), but since this article doesn't describe it, I had the impression that although the idea (of ST) is simple, there is no such standard thing in Haskell.--Imz (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Why "===" instead of "=" on the html page?
Why "===" instead of "=" on the html page?
e.g. data Maybe a === Nothing | Just a
in the pdf file this is the correct "data Maybe a = Nothing | Just a"