Difference between revisions of "Talk:Recursive function theory"
Uchchwhash (talk | contribs) m |
EndreyMark (talk | contribs) m (typographic correction) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just a thought. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 11:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
Just a thought. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 11:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | ---- |
||
| + | Dear [[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]], |
||
| + | |||
| + | Thank You very much for Your feedback and thoughts. |
||
| + | |||
| + | I do not dare to quote significant amount of materials from a (non-free) published book, so I wrote only just my questions (while learning mathematical logics). |
||
| + | I do not know enough yet from recursive function theory to write a really good article. I shall try to write better and more detailed explanations. |
||
| + | |||
| + | Now I rewrote and extended a section and renamed its headline as [[Recursive function theory#Motivations|Motivations]], discussing the relatedness of this page to functional programming. I thougt only on a toy programming language, not related directly to functional programming (but maybe useful for learning some mathematical logic concepts in a playful way). |
||
| + | |||
| + | Best wishes, |
||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:EndreyMark|EndreyMark]] 16:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
||
Latest revision as of 19:58, 7 May 2006
Wouldn't it be great if along with providing the bibliography, relevant definitions were always explained (or quoted)? This would make a self-contained encyclopaedia for Functional Programming, then.
Just a thought. --Pirated Dreams 11:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Dear Pirated Dreams,
Thank You very much for Your feedback and thoughts.
I do not dare to quote significant amount of materials from a (non-free) published book, so I wrote only just my questions (while learning mathematical logics). I do not know enough yet from recursive function theory to write a really good article. I shall try to write better and more detailed explanations.
Now I rewrote and extended a section and renamed its headline as Motivations, discussing the relatedness of this page to functional programming. I thougt only on a toy programming language, not related directly to functional programming (but maybe useful for learning some mathematical logic concepts in a playful way).
Best wishes,
EndreyMark 16:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)