Search results

Page title matches

• Singleton list confusion
  then there would be certainly less confusion.
  1 KB (161 words) - 07:16, 11 April 2008
• Strictness without ordering, or confusion
  1 KB (146 words) - 00:16, 8 September 2020

Page text matches

• Singleton list confusion
  then there would be certainly less confusion.
  1 KB (161 words) - 07:16, 11 April 2008
• Sequential ordering of evaluation
  <code>amid</code>, in [[Strictness without ordering, or confusion]].
  1 KB (175 words) - 22:53, 15 April 2020
• Type signature
  but there is still room for confusion because the first lines mentiones the type `[Char]` which does not appear i
  2 KB (317 words) - 10:49, 8 November 2016
• TypeCompose/Versions
  ...renamed type parameter "<hask>src</hask>" to "<hask>cur</hask>", to avoid confusion with <hask>Source</hask> in Phooey's use of DataDriven.
  3 KB (440 words) - 17:28, 18 March 2008
• 99 questions/Solutions/21
  ...presumes counting element positions starts at 1, perhaps causing needless confusion.
  2 KB (354 words) - 14:31, 5 January 2024
• If-then-else
  ...e is some subtlety that I'm not able to see right now." There is no longer confusion with the interference of
  6 KB (937 words) - 05:34, 10 December 2020
• Denotative programming timeline
  ...isn’t with the technical invention–which I like. Rather, I’m cranky about confusion and misleading communication, and about distraction from what we originally
  4 KB (506 words) - 06:17, 20 April 2024
• PermissiveImportsProposal
  ...ly be missed if the programmer isn't conscientious enough, and could cause confusion if they're left in. ...ant, I like {-# LANGUAGE AutoHidingImports #-}, but maybe that would cause confusion if nothing is actually being hidden. PermissiveImports is more general, but
  9 KB (1,515 words) - 23:39, 23 October 2014
• MaxBolingbroke/Talk:TypesAreCallingConventions
  Thanks for reading the paper! Let me see if I understand your confusion. This thing:
  8 KB (1,253 words) - 21:53, 12 June 2009
• Hierarchical module names
  ForeignPtr -- rename to FinalisedPtr? to void confusion with Foreign.Ptr
  7 KB (717 words) - 05:40, 25 April 2012
• Error vs. Exception
  There has been confusion about the distinction between [[error]]s and [[exception]]s for a long time This is like the confusion between [[Parallelism vs. Concurrency|parallelism and concurrency]].
  16 KB (2,728 words) - 16:45, 23 July 2019
• Bluetile/Development
  ...windows aren't handled by a layout so they don't get any decoration). This confusion should be prevented. It might be enough to just add another button to the d
  9 KB (1,449 words) - 23:16, 26 November 2011
• The Monad.Reader/Issue3/Notes on Learning Haskell
  It's not clear why I made this mistake -- I think the seeds of my confusion may have been laid by the form of I don't know if this was just a personal confusion, or more widely experienced.
  31 KB (5,175 words) - 04:59, 9 March 2011
• Category theory
  confusion).
  9 KB (1,379 words) - 04:11, 14 February 2023
• How to read Haskell
  The reason coding can be expressed this way in Haskell without undue confusion is because of its extreme conciseness. The habits you've had to learn to m
  15 KB (2,547 words) - 21:58, 29 October 2011
• Do notation considered harmful
  ...rehension syntax solely for lists, reducing the temptation (and subsequent confusion for Haskell beginners!) to extend it to all monadic types.
  10 KB (1,589 words) - 01:08, 27 September 2021
• Simonpj/Talk:FunWithTypeFuns
  his suggestion so to remove the confusion.
  14 KB (2,191 words) - 17:03, 18 February 2012
• OpenWRT
  To avoid confusion, keep in mind that there are four directories relevant to Crosstool-NG:
  13 KB (1,967 words) - 16:07, 9 August 2016
• Syntactic sugar/Cons
  See [[Singleton list confusion]].
  16 KB (2,610 words) - 17:17, 4 February 2023
• FRP explanation using reactive-banana
  ...in the previous section is called a Behaviour in reactive-banana. To avoid confusion I'll stop using the term event box from here on.
  25 KB (4,168 words) - 15:10, 24 October 2017

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)