Editing HaskellWiki talk:Copyrights (section)

== Mandatory/Optional license straw poll ==

Should the wiki be '''mandatory''' public domain (i.e. all contributions must in the public domain) or '''optional''' public domain (i.e. contributors can explicitly mark pages as being under another license)? &mdash;[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 01:13, 11 January 2006 (EST)

* '''mandatory''' (weak preference) &mdash;[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 01:13, 11 January 2006 (EST)
* '''mandatory''' for whatever license is decided, other content can be linked to and hosted elsewhere. --[[User:AaronDenney|Aaron Denney]]
* '''mandatory''' then my brain can loose "legal thoughts" as soon as I get to haskell.org (a very good thing) --[[User:NeilMitchell|NeilMitchell]] 03:29, 11 January 2006 (EST)
* '''mandatory''' but with the condition that it only applies to text in the actual markup, so images/pdfs/etc can be attached to a wiki page (I'm thinking about the Haskell definition here) under the conditions of their license. {{Unsigned|Speck}}
* public domain should '''not be mandatory''' but a permissive license maybe could {{Unsigned|Wolfgang Jeltsch}}