View source for User talk:Dag

Hi Dag,

Can we just revert all of the &lt;hask&gt; tags in the Typeclassopedia?  I'm glad we did the experiment, but the formatting is messed up in a lot of places, and the syntax highlighting simply looks bad because it's inconsistent (see e.g. the highighting of Monad vs. Applicative, the highlighting of &&&, etc.).

--[[User:Byorgey|Byorgey]] 01:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

:Agreed, done. --[[User:Dag|Dag]] 01:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

::Thanks. I had wondered about using &lt;hask&gt; tags; now we know. =)  I added a note to the [[Talk:Typeclassopedia|talk page]] recording the reasons for having things the way they are, for the benefit of future editors. --[[User:Byorgey|Byorgey]] 01:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

== Spam ==

I know you are trying to help, but moving stuff around actually makes it more difficult for me. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 16:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

:Noted. --[[User:Dag|dag]] 18:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)