Talk:Recursive function theory: Difference between revisions
Uchchwhash (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
EndreyMark (talk | contribs) m (typographic correction) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Just a thought. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 11:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC) | Just a thought. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 11:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
---- | |||
Dear [[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]], | |||
Thank You very much for Your feedback and thoughts. | |||
I do not dare to quote significant amount of materials from a (non-free) published book, so I wrote only just my questions (while learning mathematical logics). | |||
I do not know enough yet from recursive function theory to write a really good article. I shall try to write better and more detailed explanations. | |||
Now I rewrote and extended a section and renamed its headline as [[Recursive function theory#Motivations|Motivations]], discussing the relatedness of this page to functional programming. I thougt only on a toy programming language, not related directly to functional programming (but maybe useful for learning some mathematical logic concepts in a playful way). | |||
Best wishes, | |||
[[User:EndreyMark|EndreyMark]] 16:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:58, 7 May 2006
Wouldn't it be great if along with providing the bibliography, relevant definitions were always explained (or quoted)? This would make a self-contained encyclopaedia for Functional Programming, then.
Just a thought. --Pirated Dreams 11:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Dear Pirated Dreams,
Thank You very much for Your feedback and thoughts.
I do not dare to quote significant amount of materials from a (non-free) published book, so I wrote only just my questions (while learning mathematical logics). I do not know enough yet from recursive function theory to write a really good article. I shall try to write better and more detailed explanations.
Now I rewrote and extended a section and renamed its headline as Motivations, discussing the relatedness of this page to functional programming. I thougt only on a toy programming language, not related directly to functional programming (but maybe useful for learning some mathematical logic concepts in a playful way).
Best wishes,
EndreyMark 16:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)