Dependent type: Difference between revisions
EndreyMark (talk | contribs) m (Using level 1 headlines for top-level structuring, according to HaskellWiki:Guidelines) |
EndreyMark (talk | contribs) (Refining the structure: adding subsections ,,General'' to ,,Concept'', ,,Other Techniques'' to ,,Languages'') |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= The concept of dependent types = | = The concept of dependent types = | ||
== General == | |||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dependent_types Wikipedia] | |||
[http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/Caminha00/abstract.html Dependent Types in Programming] abstract in APPSEM'2000 | [http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/Caminha00/abstract.html Dependent Types in Programming] abstract in APPSEM'2000 | ||
== Type Theory == | |||
... | |||
== Illatice Combinatory Logic == | |||
To see how Illative [[CombinatoryLogic]] deals with dependent types, see combinator '''G''' described in [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/246934.html Systems of Illative Combinatory Logic complete for first-order propositional and predicate calculus] by Henk Barendregt, Martin Bunder, Wil Dekkers. | To see how Illative [[CombinatoryLogic]] deals with dependent types, see combinator '''G''' described in [http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/246934.html Systems of Illative Combinatory Logic complete for first-order propositional and predicate calculus] by Henk Barendregt, Martin Bunder, Wil Dekkers. | ||
Line 16: | Line 24: | ||
= Dependently typed languages = | = Dependently typed languages = | ||
== Epigram == | |||
[http://www.e-pig.org/ Epigram] is a full dependently typed programming language see especially | [http://www.e-pig.org/ Epigram] is a full dependently typed programming language see especially | ||
Line 23: | Line 33: | ||
Dependent types (of this language) also provide a not-forgetful concept of '''views''' (already mentioned in the Haskell [[Future]]; | Dependent types (of this language) also provide a not-forgetful concept of '''views''' (already mentioned in the Haskell [[Future]]; | ||
the connection between these concepts is described in p. 32 of Epigram Tutorial (section ''4.6 Patterns Forget; Matching Is Remembering''). | the connection between these concepts is described in p. 32 of Epigram Tutorial (section ''4.6 Patterns Forget; Matching Is Remembering''). | ||
== Other techniques == | |||
[http://www-sop.inria.fr/oasis/DTP00/ [APPSEM Workshop on Subtyping & Dependent Types in Programming] | |||
= Dependent types in Haskell programming = | = Dependent types in Haskell programming = |
Revision as of 16:46, 1 March 2006
The concept of dependent types
General
Dependent Types in Programming abstract in APPSEM'2000
Type Theory
...
Illatice Combinatory Logic
To see how Illative CombinatoryLogic deals with dependent types, see combinator G described in Systems of Illative Combinatory Logic complete for first-order propositional and predicate calculus by Henk Barendregt, Martin Bunder, Wil Dekkers. It seems to me that the dependent type construct of Epigram corresponds to in Illative Combinatory Logic. I think e.g. the followings should correspond to each other:
Dependently typed languages
Epigram
Epigram is a full dependently typed programming language see especially
- Epigram Tutorial by Conor McBride
- and Why dependent types matter by Thorsten Altenkirch, Conor McBride and James McKinna).
Dependent types (of this language) also provide a not-forgetful concept of views (already mentioned in the Haskell Future; the connection between these concepts is described in p. 32 of Epigram Tutorial (section 4.6 Patterns Forget; Matching Is Remembering).
Other techniques
[APPSEM Workshop on Subtyping & Dependent Types in Programming
Dependent types in Haskell programming
- John Hughes: Dependent Types in Haskell (some ideas).
- SimulatingDependentTypes of HaWiki