How to read Haskell: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
-- something we can work through slowly (and show why we find it beautiful) | -- something we can work through slowly (and show why we find it beautiful) | ||
</haskell> | </haskell> | ||
=== Hint: use type signatures === | |||
When you see stuff like this | |||
<haskell> | |||
-- example please! | |||
foo :: Bar Ping Pong -> Baz Zed Dubya -> IO (DoublePlus Good) | |||
</haskell> | |||
...don't fight it! These are type signatures and they are an incredibly useful way of getting a rough idea what a function is supposed to do. | |||
:''elaborate'' | |||
== What confuses non-Haskellers == | == What confuses non-Haskellers == |
Revision as of 10:50, 3 August 2006
This stub is intended to become a tutorial on reading Haskell. It's aimed at the non-Haskeller who probably doesn't care too much about trying to write code, but wants to understand it.
The tutorial
...needs to be written
-- insert here some horrible (for the non-Haskeller) long example
-- something we can work through slowly (and show why we find it beautiful)
Hint: use type signatures
When you see stuff like this
-- example please!
foo :: Bar Ping Pong -> Baz Zed Dubya -> IO (DoublePlus Good)
...don't fight it! These are type signatures and they are an incredibly useful way of getting a rough idea what a function is supposed to do.
- elaborate
What confuses non-Haskellers
Since this tutorial is not yet written, we encourage you to note here the things which confuse non-Haskellers about the code code.
- layout instead of semicolons?
- super-super-concise stuff (things using liftM and liftM2)
- the difference between and
x <- foo
x = foo