Talk:Performance/Data types: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 02:41, 7 May 2008

In the newtypes section, could the first paragraph be clearer about the caveat "in most cases"? That is, could it point when using a newtype will not be optimised away? I myself was (am) under the impression that newtype is always optimised away. When can't/won't it be?

- It is always optimised away, yes. The report requires that. dons 02:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:18, 6 May 2008 (view source) Dbueno (talk \| contribs) (newtype optimisation clarification request) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 02:41, 7 May 2008 (view source) DonStewart (talk \| contribs) No edit summary
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* In the newtypes section, could the first paragraph be clearer about the caveat "in most cases"? That is, could it point when using a newtype ''will not'' be optimised away? I myself was (am) under the impression that newtype is always optimised away. When can't/won't it be?		* In the newtypes section, could the first paragraph be clearer about the caveat "in most cases"? That is, could it point when using a newtype ''will not'' be optimised away? I myself was (am) under the impression that newtype is always optimised away. When can't/won't it be?

			** It is always optimised away, yes. The report requires that. [[User:DonStewart\|dons]] 02:41, 7 May 2008 (UTC)