Benchmarks Game/Parallel/RegexDNA
Regex-DNA
Old submission is:
Running:
* ghc --make -O2 -fglasgow-exts -package regex-posix -optc-O3 -threaded regexdna3.hs * ./regexdna3 +RTS -N2 < big.txt
Code:
This is almost identical to the old code, with a parallel map used to perform the first phase of the benchmark (counting matches of each variant). I had trouble compiling the original with Text.Regex.Posix so I used Text.Regex.PCRE (which is probably faster, are hackage packages fair game?). I see a speedup from 46 seconds to 33 seconds when running this case -N2 vs the original case (with PCRE) unthreaded.
I see some weirdness in the shootout page's numbers. They list haskell running at 70 seconds (with Posix regex) and Python running as 25 seconds. I have a comparable system (roughly), and when I run the Python test case I get 46 seconds (nearly identical to the Haskell PCRE case). This probably means their machine has better memory bandwidth and that moving to PCRE is a big win (I believe python uses PCRE), but I'm not sure.
-- The Computer Language Benchmarks Game
-- http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/
-- Contributed by: Sergei Matusevich 2007
import Control.Parallel.Strategies
import List
import Text.Regex.PCRE -- requires regex-pcre-builtin
import qualified Data.ByteString.Char8 as B
variants = [
"agggtaaa|tttaccct",
"[cgt]gggtaaa|tttaccc[acg]",
"a[act]ggtaaa|tttacc[agt]t",
"ag[act]gtaaa|tttac[agt]ct",
"agg[act]taaa|ttta[agt]cct",
"aggg[acg]aaa|ttt[cgt]ccct",
"agggt[cgt]aa|tt[acg]accct",
"agggta[cgt]a|t[acg]taccct",
"agggtaa[cgt]|[acg]ttaccct" ]
main = do
file <- B.getContents
let [s1,s2,s3] = map (B.concat . tail) $ groupBy notHeader $ B.split '\n' file
showVars r = r ++ ' ' : show ((s2 =~ r :: Int) + (s3 =~ r :: Int))
mapM_ putStrLn $ parMap rnf showVars variants
putChar '\n'
print (B.length file)
print (B.length s1 + B.length s2 + B.length s3)
print (B.length s1 + B.length s3 + length (B.unpack s2 >>= substCh))
where notHeader _ s = B.null s || B.head s /= '>'
substCh 'B' = "(c|g|t)"
substCh 'D' = "(a|g|t)"
substCh 'H' = "(a|c|t)"
substCh 'K' = "(g|t)"
substCh 'M' = "(a|c)"
substCh 'N' = "(a|c|g|t)"
substCh 'R' = "(a|g)"
substCh 'S' = "(c|g)"
substCh 'V' = "(a|c|g)"
substCh 'W' = "(a|t)"
substCh 'Y' = "(c|t)"
substCh etc = [etc]