Difference between revisions of "Blog articles/Parallel"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DonStewart (talk | contribs) |
DonStewart (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Parallelism and Concurrency == |
== Parallelism and Concurrency == |
||
| + | |||
| + | === Transitioning from sequential programming === |
||
| + | |||
| + | Making the transition from sequential to implicit parallel programming |
||
| + | |||
| + | * [http://www.embedded.com/design/multicore/201500267 Part 1: How sequential languages obscure parallelism] |
||
| + | * [http://www.embedded.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201801070 Part 2: How to achieve parallel execution] |
||
| + | * [http://www.embedded.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201802337 Part 3: Explicit parallel programming with threads and locks] |
||
| + | * [http://www.embedded.com/design/multicore/201803783?_requestid=708481 Part 4: Explicit parallelism: message-passing programming] |
||
| + | * [http://www.embedded.com/design/multicore/201804960?_requestid=708724 Part 5: Implicit parallel programming: Declarative languages] |
||
| + | * [http://www.embedded.com/design/multicore/201806715 Part 6: So, why aren't we using functional languages yet?] |
||
=== Threads === |
=== Threads === |
||
Revision as of 17:05, 23 September 2007
Parallelism and Concurrency
Transitioning from sequential programming
Making the transition from sequential to implicit parallel programming
- Part 1: How sequential languages obscure parallelism
- Part 2: How to achieve parallel execution
- Part 3: Explicit parallel programming with threads and locks
- Part 4: Explicit parallelism: message-passing programming
- Part 5: Implicit parallel programming: Declarative languages
- Part 6: So, why aren't we using functional languages yet?
Threads
- Threads Considered Harmful (discusses The Problem with Threads)
Transactional memory
Nested data paralellism
- Nested Data Parallelism in Haskell (video)
- More Haskell parallelism
- Nested Data Parallelism in Haskell