Difference between revisions of "Blog articles/Testing"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
DonStewart (talk | contribs) |
DonStewart (talk | contribs) (→Coq) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* [http://www.rubrication.net/2007/04/24/strong-specifications/ Strong specifications in Coq: the type says everything] |
* [http://www.rubrication.net/2007/04/24/strong-specifications/ Strong specifications in Coq: the type says everything] |
||
| + | * Proving the monad laws in Coq |
||
| + | ** [http://sequence.complete.org/node/358 Introduction] |
||
| + | ** [http://sequence.complete.org/node/359 The First and Second Laws] |
||
| + | ** [http://sequence.complete.org/node/360 The Third Law] |
||
=== Isabelle=== |
=== Isabelle=== |
||
Revision as of 00:30, 24 September 2007
Type system enforcement
Testing, correctness and proofs
QuickCheck
- Introduction to QuickCheck
- QuickChecking a window manager
- Robustness and QuickCheck
- Parsec Parser Testing with QuickCheck
- QuickCheck : Why Testing code should be Laissez-faire
HUnit
Catch
- Does XMonad crash? On proving pattern coverage with Catch
- Preconditions on XMonad
- Equational Reasoning in Haskell
Proofs
GADTs
Coq
- Strong specifications in Coq: the type says everything
- Proving the monad laws in Coq
Isabelle
Related work
- See the section on theorem provers