Difference between revisions of "Data declaration with constraint"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(maybe multi-parameter type classes are a way out)
(Added use of GADTs to add a context to data constructors.)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
=== Answer ===
 
=== Answer ===
   
Only functions can have type constraints.
+
In Haskell 98, only functions can have type constraints.
 
The type constraint of a <hask>data</hask> only refers to the constructors.
 
The type constraint of a <hask>data</hask> only refers to the constructors.
 
The designers of Haskell 98 do now think, that it was a bad decision to allow constraints on constructors.
 
The designers of Haskell 98 do now think, that it was a bad decision to allow constraints on constructors.
Line 26: Line 26:
 
== Solution ==
 
== Solution ==
   
  +
You could use ghc's [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/users_guide/data-type-extensions.html#gadt-style Generalised Algebraic Data Structures (GADTs)] to add an implicit context to the data constructors.
But how can one bake type constraints into a type?
 
You cannot. One should insert a discussion here, whether it is sensible to want this.
 
   
 
There has been some discussion about whether it is sensible to want this.
For now you have to stick to [[multi-parameter type class]]es,
 
  +
where <hask>T a</hask> and <hask>a</hask> are separate arguments.
+
A Haskell 98 workaround is to use [[multi-parameter type class]]es, where <hask>T a</hask> and <hask>a</hask> are separate arguments.
   
   

Revision as of 23:07, 4 June 2013

Problem

Question

I have declared

data C a  =>  T a = Cons a

and I hoped that now the type checker knows, that every value of type T a satisfies the type constraint on a. I like to declare an instance for an type constructor class for the type constructor T but its methods require type constraints that depend on the particular type constructor T.

E.g.

instance Vector T where
   add (Cons x) (Cons y) = Cons (x+y)    -- requires Num constraint on type a

Answer

In Haskell 98, only functions can have type constraints. The type constraint of a data only refers to the constructors. The designers of Haskell 98 do now think, that it was a bad decision to allow constraints on constructors.

Solution

You could use ghc's Generalised Algebraic Data Structures (GADTs) to add an implicit context to the data constructors.

There has been some discussion about whether it is sensible to want this.

A Haskell 98 workaround is to use multi-parameter type classes, where T a and a are separate arguments.


See also