Personal tools

Dependent type

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (More precise location of a link to Future#Extensions of Haskell in section - Eptigram)
(Simulating them: links to Type arithmetic)
Line 66: Line 66:
=== Simulating them ===
=== Simulating them ===
* [ SimulatingDependentTypes] of HaWiki
* [ SimulatingDependentTypes] of HaWiki
* The [[Type#See also|''See also'' section of Type]] page contains links to many related idioms.
* The [[Type#See also|''See also'' section of Type]] page contains links to many related idioms. Especially [[type arithmetic]] seems to me also a way yielding some tastes from dependent type theory.
* On the usefulness of such idioms in practice, see HaskellDB's pages
* On the usefulness of such idioms in practice, see HaskellDB's pages
** [ updated] page (see ''Papers'' subsection on [ Documentation])
** [ updated] page (see ''Papers'' subsection on [ Documentation])

Revision as of 11:11, 17 June 2006


1 The concept of dependent types

1.1 General


Dependent Types in Programming abstract in APPSEM'2000

1.2 Type theory

Simon Thompson: Type Theory and Functional Programming. Section 6.3 deals with dependent types, but because of the strong emphasis on Curry-Howard isomorphism and the connections between logic and programming, the book seemed cathartic for me even from its beginning.

Another interesting approach to Curry-Howard isomorphism and the concept of dependent type: Lecture 9. Semantics and pragmatics of text and dialogue dicsusses these concepts in the context of linguistics. Written by Arne Ranta, see also his online course and other linguistical materials on the Linguistics wikipage.

Types Forum

1.3 Illative combinatory logic

To see how Illative Combinatory logic deals with dependent types, see combinator G described in Systems of Illative Combinatory Logic complete for first-order propositional and predicate calculus by Henk Barendregt, Martin Bunder, Wil Dekkers. It seems to me that the dependent type construct \forall x : S \Rightarrow T of Epigram corresponds to \mathbf G\;S\;(\lambda x . T) in Illative Combinatory Logic. I think e.g. the followings should correspond to each other:

  • \mathrm{realNullvector} :\;\;\;\forall n: \mathrm{Nat} \Rightarrow \mathrm{RealVector}\;n
  • \mathbf G\;\,\mathrm{Nat}\;\,\mathrm{RealVector}\;\,\mathrm{realNullvector}

2 Dependently typed languages

2.1 Epigram

Epigram is a full dependently typed programming language, see especially

Dependent types (of this language) also provide a not-forgetful concept of views (already mentioned in the Haskell Future#Extensions of Haskell; the connection between these concepts is described in p. 32 of Epigram Tutorial (section 4.6 Patterns Forget; Matching Is Remembering).

See Epigram also as theorem prover.

2.2 Agda

Agda is a system for incrementally developing proofs and programs. Agda is also a functional language with dependent types. This language is very similar to cayenne and agda is intended to be a (almost) full implementation of it in the future.“

People who are interested also in theorem proving may see the theorem provers page.

2.3 Cayenne

Cayenne is influenced also by constructive type theory (see its page).

Dependent types make it possible not to have a separate module lenguage and a core language. This idea may concern Haskell too, see First-class module page.

Depandent types make it useful also as a theorem prover.

2.4 Other techniques

APPSEM Workshop on Subtyping & Dependent Types in Programming

3 Dependent types in Haskell programming

3.1 Proposals

John Hughes: Dependent Types in Haskell (some ideas).

3.2 Simulating them