Difference between revisions of "Do notation considered harmful"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(links to posts on the topic) |
(some draft) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | <!-- |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Criticism == |
||
| + | |||
| + | Haskell's <hask>do</hask> notation is popular and ubiquitous. |
||
| + | However we shall not ignore that there are several problems. |
||
| + | Here we like to shed some light on aspects you may not have thought about, so far. |
||
| + | |||
| + | --> |
||
| + | |||
== See also == |
== See also == |
||
Revision as of 22:05, 4 November 2007
See also
- Paul Hudak in Haskell-Cafe: A regressive view of support for imperative programming in Haskell
- Data.Syntaxfree on Wordpress: Do-notation considered harmful