Generic number type
Can I have a generic numeric data type in Haskell which covers
Double and so on, like it is done in scripting languages like Perl and MatLab?
Answer: In principle you can define a type like
data GenericNumber = Integer Integer | Rational Rational | Double Double
and define appropriate instances for
Num class et. al.
However you will find that it is difficult to implement these methods in a way that is appropriate for each use case.
There is simply no type that can emulate the others.
Floating point numbers are imprecise - a/b*b=a does not hold in general.
Rationals are precise but pi and sqrt 2 are not rational.
That is, when using
GenericNumber<hask>s you will encounter exactly the problems that all scripting language users have encountered so far (or ignored :-). == Solutions == It is strongly advised to carefully check whether a GenericNumber is indeed useful for your application. So let's revisit some examples and their idiomatic solutions in plain Haskell 98. === average === You may find it cumbersome to write <haskell> average :: Fractional a => [a] -> a average xs = sum xs / fromIntegral (length xs) </haskell> and you may prefer <haskell> average :: [GenericNumber] -> GenericNumber average xs = sum xs / genericNumberLength xs </haskell> with an appropriate implementation of <hask>genericNumberLength.
However, there is already
Data.List.genericLength and you can write
average :: Fractional a => [a] -> a average xs = sum xs / genericlength xs
You find it easy to write
1 / 3 :: Rational
but uncomfortable that
1 / floor pi :: Rational
does not work.
The first example works, because the numeric literals
3 are interpreted as rationals itself.
The second example fails, because
floor always returns an
Integral number type, where
Rational is not an instance.
You should use
% instead. This constructs a fraction out of two integers:
1 % 3 :: Rational 1 % floor pi :: Rational
- Suggestions for implementing a generic number type: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2007-June/027092.html