Difference between revisions of "Haskell and mathematics/Hierarchy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page) |
Forkiliens (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Here is a place to discuss ideas for a mathematician-attracting hierarchy of mathematics modules that incorporate a sound algebraic class structure. |
Here is a place to discuss ideas for a mathematician-attracting hierarchy of mathematics modules that incorporate a sound algebraic class structure. |
||
+ | |||
+ | Basic algebraic structures in Haskell: |
||
+ | ftp://ftp.botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/basAlgPropos/ |
||
+ | |||
+ | Categorical Approach to representing mathematical structures in Haskell: |
||
+ | ftp://ftp.botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/docon/ |
||
''For me that probably starts with the semigroup/group/ring setup, and good |
''For me that probably starts with the semigroup/group/ring setup, and good |
Revision as of 03:58, 21 March 2008
Mathematical Hierarchy
Here is a place to discuss ideas for a mathematician-attracting hierarchy of mathematics modules that incorporate a sound algebraic class structure.
Basic algebraic structures in Haskell: ftp://ftp.botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/basAlgPropos/
Categorical Approach to representing mathematical structures in Haskell: ftp://ftp.botik.ru/pub/local/Mechveliani/docon/
For me that probably starts with the semigroup/group/ring setup, and good arbitrary-precision as well as approximate linear algebra support.
I agree: semigoups like lattices are everywhere. Then there could be a uniform treatment of linear algebra, polynomial equations, operator algebra, etc.