Personal tools

Mathematical prelude discussion

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(link to: haskell gsoc proposal for richer numerical type classes and supporting algorithms)
m (Haskell Prime': redirect broken link)
Line 28: Line 28:
=== Haskell Prime' ===
=== Haskell Prime' ===
[ Numeric classes] on the Haskell' wiki
[ Numeric classes] on the Haskell' wiki
=== See Also ===
=== See Also ===

Latest revision as of 13:31, 4 October 2011


[edit] 1 Purpose

There have been many ideas for improving the prelude's support for mathematics. Including the addition of algebraic classes. But the discussion is spread over years of list archives and a half dozen websites. And the discussion has never gelled.

This page is intended to collect links to past discussion, and to provide a focal point for advancing the discussion.

[edit] 2 Todo

[edit] 3 Libraries and proposals

[edit] 3.1 Numeric Prelude

Working set of common type classes and instances.

[edit] 3.2 Basic Algebra Library (BAL)

Is not in community report 2006-06.
0.04/announce.txt (2006-02)
Formerly refered to as "basic algebra proposal".

Categorical Approach to representing mathematical structures in Haskell: [1]

[edit] 3.3 Haskell Prime'

Numeric classes on the Haskell' wiki

[edit] 3.4 See Also

[edit] 4 Discussion

For me that probably starts with the semigroup/group/ring setup, and good arbitrary-precision as well as approximate linear algebra support.

I agree: semigoups like lattices are everywhere. Then there could be a uniform treatment of linear algebra, polynomial equations, operator algebra, etc.

MAGMA is an example of a language which embraced mathematical structure. MitchellNCharity 23:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Aldor/Axiom may be a place to look for a good type class hierarchy