Difference between revisions of "Monad"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Nondeterminism -> Nondeterminism through backtracking)
(→‎Monad class: improved indentation)
(70 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Standard class|Monad|module=Control.Monad|module-doc=Control-Monad|package=base}}
 
{{Standard class|Monad|module=Control.Monad|module-doc=Control-Monad|package=base}}
   
  +
'''''Monads''''' in Haskell can be thought of as ''composable'' computation descriptions. The essence of monad is thus ''separation'' of ''composition timeline'' from the composed computation's ''execution timeline'', as well as the ability of ''computation'' to implicitly carry extra data, as pertaining to the computation itself, in addition to its ''one'' (hence the name) output, that it '''''will produce''''' when run (or queried, or called upon). This lends monads to supplementing ''pure'' calculations with features like I/O, common environment or state, etc.
'''Monads''' in Haskell are structures used to supplement pure computations with features like state, common environment or I/O. Even though Haskell is a purely-functional language, side-effects can be conveniently simulated using monads.
 
   
  +
Each monad, or computation type, provides means, subject to '''''Monad Laws''''', to '''''(a)''''' ''create'' a description of computation action that will produce (a.k.a. "return") a given Haskell value, '''''(b)''''' somehow ''run'' a computation action description (possibly getting its output back into Haskell should the monad choose to allow it, if computations described by the monad are pure, or causing the prescribed side effects if it's not), and '''''(c)''''' ''combine'' (a.k.a. "bind") a computation action description with a ''reaction'' to it – a regular Haskell function of one argument (that will receive computation-produced value) returning another action description (using or dependent on that value, if need be) – thus creating a combined computation action description that will feed the original action's output through the reaction while automatically taking care of the particulars of the computational process itself. A monad might also define additional primitives to provide access to and/or enable manipulation of data it implicitly carries, specific to its nature.
Because they are very useful in practice but rather mind-twisting for the beginners, numerous tutorials that deal exclusively with monads were created (see [[Monad#Monad tutorials|monad tutorials]]).
 
  +
  +
<haskell style="background-color:#f8f1ab;border-radius:15px;border:2px solid #000000;padding:15px">
  +
# Monad Laws in pseudo code
  +
(a) reaction $ value ==> action_description
  +
  +
(c) action_description `bind` reaction ==> action_description
  +
  +
(b) run action_description ==> value
  +
</haskell>
  +
  +
Thus in Haskell, though it is a purely-functional language, side effects that '''''will be performed''''' by a computation can be dealt with and combined ''purely'' at the monad's composition time. Monads thus resemble programs in a particular [[DSL]]. While programs may describe impure effects and actions ''outside'' Haskell, they can still be combined and processed (''"assembled"'') purely, ''inside'' Haskell, creating a pure Haskell value - a computation action description that describes an impure calculation. That is how Monads in Haskell '''''separate''''' between the ''pure'' and the ''impure''.
  +
 
The computation doesn't have to be impure and can be pure itself as well. Then monads serve to provide the benefits of separation of concerns, and automatic creation of a computational "pipeline". Because they are very useful in practice but rather mind-twisting for the beginners, numerous tutorials that deal exclusively with monads were created (see [[Monad#Monad tutorials|monad tutorials]]).
   
 
== Common monads ==
 
== Common monads ==
 
Most common applications of monads include:
 
Most common applications of monads include:
 
* Representing failure using <hask>Maybe</hask> monad
 
* Representing failure using <hask>Maybe</hask> monad
* Nondeterminism through backtracking using <hask>List</hask> monad
+
* Nondeterminism using <hask>List</hask> monad to represent carrying multiple values
 
* State using <hask>State</hask> monad
 
* State using <hask>State</hask> monad
 
* Read-only environment using <hask>Reader</hask> monad
 
* Read-only environment using <hask>Reader</hask> monad
Line 14: Line 27:
   
 
== Monad class ==
 
== Monad class ==
  +
All common monads are members of '''Monad''' class defined like this:
 
  +
Monads can be viewed as a standard programming interface to various data or control structures, which is captured by the <hask>Monad</hask> class. All common monads are members of it:
   
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
 
class Monad m where
 
class Monad m where
(>>=) :: m a -> (a -> m b) -> m b
+
(>>=) :: m a -> ( a -> m b) -> m b
(>>) :: m a -> m b -> m b
+
(>>) :: m a -> m b -> m b
return :: a -> m a
+
return :: a -> m a
fail :: String -> m a
+
fail :: String -> m a
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
   
In addition to implementing the class functions, all instances of Monad should obey following equations:
+
In addition to implementing the class functions, all instances of Monad should obey the following equations, or '''''Monad Laws''''':
   
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
return a >>= k = k a
+
return a >>= k = k a
m >>= return = m
+
m >>= return = m
m >>= (\x -> k x >>= h) = (m >>= k) >>= h
+
m >>= (\x -> k x >>= h) = (m >>= k) >>= h
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
   
See [[Monad laws|this intuitive explanation]] of why they should obey the Monad laws.
+
See [[Monad laws|this intuitive explanation]] of why they should obey the Monad laws. It basically says that monad's reactions should be associative under Kleisli composition, defined as <code>(f >=> g) x = f x >>= g</code>, with <code>return</code> its left and right identity element.
   
 
Any Monad can be made a [[Functor]] by defining
 
Any Monad can be made a [[Functor]] by defining
Line 44: Line 58:
 
== Special notation ==
 
== Special notation ==
   
In order to improve the look of code that uses monads Haskell provides a special [[syntactic sugar]] called <hask>do</hask>-notation. For example, following expression:
+
In order to improve the look of code that uses monads Haskell provides a special [[syntactic sugar]] called <hask>do</hask>-notation. For example, the following expression:
  +
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
thing1 >>= (\x -> func1 x >>= (\y -> thing2 >>= (\_ -> func2 y (\z -> return z))))
+
thing1 >>= (\x -> func1 x >>= (\y -> thing2
  +
>>= (\_ -> func2 y >>= (\z -> return z))))
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
  +
 
which can be written more clearly by breaking it into several lines and omitting parentheses:
 
which can be written more clearly by breaking it into several lines and omitting parentheses:
  +
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
 
thing1 >>= \x ->
 
thing1 >>= \x ->
Line 56: Line 74:
 
return z
 
return z
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
  +
can be also written using the <hask>do</hask>-notation as follows:
+
This can also be written using the <hask>do</hask>-notation as follows:
  +
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
 
do
 
do
Line 65: Line 85:
 
return z
 
return z
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
Code written using the <hask>do</hask>-notation is transformed by the compiler to ordinary expressions that use <hask>Monad</hask> class functions.
 
   
 
Code written using <hask>do</hask>-notation is transformed by the compiler to ordinary expressions that use the functions from the <hask>Monad</hask> class.
When using the <hask>do</hask>-notation and a monad like <hask>State</hask> or <hask>IO</hask> programs look very much like programs written in an imperative language as each line contains a statement that can change the simulated global state of the program and optionally binds a (local) variable that can be used by the statements later in the code block.
 
  +
 
When using <hask>do</hask>-notation and a monad like <hask>State</hask> or <hask>IO</hask> programs look very much like programs written in an imperative language as each line contains a statement that can change the simulated global state of the program and optionally binds a (local) variable that can be used by the statements later in the code block.
   
 
It is possible to intermix the <hask>do</hask>-notation with regular notation.
 
It is possible to intermix the <hask>do</hask>-notation with regular notation.
   
More on the <hask>do</hask>-notation can be found in a section of [[Monads as computation#Do notation|Monads as computation]] and in other [[Monad#Monad tutorials|tutorials]].
+
More on <hask>do</hask>-notation can be found in a section of [[Monads as computation#Do notation|Monads as computation]] and in other [[Monad#Monad tutorials|tutorials]].
   
== Commutetive monads ==
+
== Commutative monads ==
 
'''Commutative monads''' are monads for which the order of actions makes no difference (they '''commute'''), that is when following code:
 
'''Commutative monads''' are monads for which the order of actions makes no difference (they '''commute'''), that is when following code:
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
 
do
 
do
a <- f x
+
a <- actA
b <- g y
+
b <- actB
 
m a b
 
m a b
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
Line 84: Line 105:
 
<haskell>
 
<haskell>
 
do
 
do
b <- g y
+
b <- actB
a <- f x
+
a <- actA
 
m a b
 
m a b
 
</haskell>
 
</haskell>
Line 97: Line 118:
 
Monads are known for being deeply confusing to lots of people, so there are plenty of tutorials specifically related to monads. Each takes a different approach to Monads, and hopefully everyone will find something useful.
 
Monads are known for being deeply confusing to lots of people, so there are plenty of tutorials specifically related to monads. Each takes a different approach to Monads, and hopefully everyone will find something useful.
   
  +
See the [[Monad tutorials timeline]] for a comprehensive list of monad tutorials.
* [http://www.engr.mun.ca/~theo/Misc/haskell_and_monads.htm Monads for the Working Haskell Programmer]
 
* [[Monads as containers]], [[Monads as computation]]
 
* [http://haskell.org/all_about_monads/html/index.html All About Monads]
 
* [[Simple monad examples]]
 
* [http://www.loria.fr/~kow/monads/index.html Of monads and space suits]
 
* [http://sigfpe.blogspot.com/2006/08/you-could-have-invented-monads-and.html You could have invented monads]
 
* [[Meet Bob The Monadic Lover]], or the slightly more serious [[The Monadic Way]]
 
* Computational monads [http://programming.reddit.com/info/ox6s/comments/coxiv part 1] and [http://programming.reddit.com/info/ox6s/comments/coxoh part 2].
 
* [http://www.alpheccar.org/fr/posts/show/60 Three kind of monads] : sequencing, side effects or containers
 
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monads_in_functional_programming Article on monads on Wikipedia]
 
* [[IO inside]] page explains why I/O in Haskell is implemented with a monad.
 
* [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Books_and_tutorials#Using_monads More tutorials on monads]
 
* [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Blog_articles#Monads Even more tutorials on monads..]
 
   
 
== Monad reference guides ==
 
== Monad reference guides ==
Line 123: Line 132:
 
Implementations of monads in other languages.
 
Implementations of monads in other languages.
   
* [http://programming.reddit.com/goto?id=1761q C]
+
* [http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1761q/monads_in_c_pt_ii/ C]
  +
* [https://github.com/clojure/algo.monads Clojure]
* [http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/FC++.1.5/monad.h C++], [http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/~yannis/fc++/New1.5/lambda.html#monad doc]
 
 
* [http://cml.cs.uchicago.edu/pages/cml.html CML.event] ?
 
* [http://cml.cs.uchicago.edu/pages/cml.html CML.event] ?
* [http://clean.cs.ru.nl/Download/Download_Libraries/Std_Env/StdFunc/stdfunc.html Clean] State monad
+
* [http://www.st.cs.ru.nl/papers/2010/CleanStdEnvAPI.pdf Clean] State monad
 
* [http://cratylus.freewebspace.com/monads-in-javascript.htm JavaScript]
 
* [http://cratylus.freewebspace.com/monads-in-javascript.htm JavaScript]
* [http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dherman/code/monads/JavaMonads.tar.gz Java] (tar.gz)
+
* [http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dherman/browse/code/monads/JavaMonads/ Java]
 
* [http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.concatenative/1506 Joy]
 
* [http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.concatenative/1506 Joy]
* [http://research.microsoft.com/~emeijer/Papers/XLinq%20XML%20Programming%20Refactored%20(The%20Return%20Of%20The%20Monoids).htm LINQ], [http://www.idealliance.org/xmlusa/05/call/xmlpapers/63.1015/.63.html#S4. more, C#, VB]
+
* [http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/emeijer/Papers/XLinq%20XML%20Programming%20Refactored%20(The%20Return%20Of%20The%20Monoids).htm LINQ]
* [http://sleepingsquirrel.org/monads/monads.lisp Lisp]
+
* [http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-monad-macros/monad-macros.htm Lisp]
 
* [http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1136#comment-12448 Miranda]
 
* [http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1136#comment-12448 Miranda]
 
* OCaml:
 
* OCaml:
 
** [http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~carette/pa_monad/ OCaml]
 
** [http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~carette/pa_monad/ OCaml]
 
** [https://mailman.rice.edu/pipermail/metaocaml-users-l/2005-March/000057.html more]
 
** [https://mailman.rice.edu/pipermail/metaocaml-users-l/2005-March/000057.html more]
** [http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~beffara/darcs/pivm/caml-vm/monad.mli also]
 
 
** [http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~carette/metamonads/ MetaOcaml]
 
** [http://www.cas.mcmaster.ca/~carette/metamonads/ MetaOcaml]
** [http://enfranchisedmind.com/blog/archive/2007/08/06/307 A Monad Tutorial for Ocaml]
+
** [http://blog.enfranchisedmind.com/2007/08/a-monad-tutorial-for-ocaml/ A Monad Tutorial for Ocaml]
  +
* [http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/p66e/are_monads_actually_used_in_anything_except Perl6 ?]
* [http://sleepingsquirrel.org/monads/monads.html Perl]
 
* [http://programming.reddit.com/info/p66e/comments Perl6 ?]
 
 
* [http://logic.csci.unt.edu/tarau/research/PapersHTML/monadic.html Prolog]
 
* [http://logic.csci.unt.edu/tarau/research/PapersHTML/monadic.html Prolog]
 
* Python
 
* Python
** [http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Cookbook/Python/Recipe/439361 Python]
+
** [http://code.activestate.com/recipes/439361/ Python]
 
** Twisted's [http://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/p66e/are_monads_actually_used_in_anything_except/cp8eh Deferred monad]
** [http://www.python.org/pycon/papers/deferex/ here]
 
** Twisted's [http://programming.reddit.com/info/p66e/comments/cp8eh Deferred monad]
 
 
* Ruby:
 
* Ruby:
 
** [http://moonbase.rydia.net/mental/writings/programming/monads-in-ruby/00introduction.html Ruby]
 
** [http://moonbase.rydia.net/mental/writings/programming/monads-in-ruby/00introduction.html Ruby]
** [http://meta-meta.blogspot.com/2006/12/monads-in-ruby-part-1-identity.htmland other implementation]
+
** [http://meta-meta.blogspot.com/2006/12/monads-in-ruby-part-1-identity.html and other implementation]
* Scala:
 
** [http://scala.epfl.ch/examples/files/simpleInterpreter.html Scala]
 
** [http://scala.epfl.ch/examples/files/callccInterpreter.html A continuation monad]
 
 
* Scheme:
 
* Scheme:
 
** [http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/monad-in-Scheme.html Scheme]
 
** [http://okmij.org/ftp/Scheme/monad-in-Scheme.html Scheme]
 
** [http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dherman/research/tutorials/monads-for-schemers.txt also]
 
** [http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/dherman/research/tutorials/monads-for-schemers.txt also]
  +
** Monads & Do notation: [https://el-tramo.be/blog/async-monad/ Part 1] [https://el-tramo.be/blog/scheme-monads/ Part 2]
  +
* [http://www.javiersoto.me/post/106875422394 Swift]
 
* [http://wiki.tcl.tk/13844 Tcl]
 
* [http://wiki.tcl.tk/13844 Tcl]
 
* [http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/monadic-shell.html The Unix Shell]
 
* [http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/monadic-shell.html The Unix Shell]
Line 162: Line 167:
 
Unfinished:
 
Unfinished:
   
* [http://slate.tunes.org/repos/main/src/unfinished/monad.slate Slate]
 
 
* [http://wiki.tcl.tk/14295 Parsing], [http://wiki.tcl.tk/13844 Maybe and Error] in Tcl
 
* [http://wiki.tcl.tk/14295 Parsing], [http://wiki.tcl.tk/13844 Maybe and Error] in Tcl
   
Line 171: Line 175:
 
Please add them if you know of other implementations.
 
Please add them if you know of other implementations.
   
[http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1136 Collection of links to monad implementations in various languages.] on [http://lambda-the-ultimate/ Lambda The Ultimate].
+
[http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1136 Collection of links to monad implementations in various languages.] on [http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/ Lambda The Ultimate].
   
 
==Interesting monads==
 
==Interesting monads==
Line 177: Line 181:
 
A list of monads for various evaluation strategies and games:
 
A list of monads for various evaluation strategies and games:
   
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-Identity.html Identity monad]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Identity.html Identity monad] - the trivial monad.
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Data-Maybe.html Optional results]
+
* [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Data-Maybe.html Optional results from computations] - error checking without null.
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/monad-mersenne-random/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Mersenne-Random.html Random values] - run code in an environment with access to a stream of random numbers.
* [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/New_monads/MonadRandom Random values]
 
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-Reader.html Read only state]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Reader.html Read only variables] - guarantee read-only access to values.
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-Writer.html Writable state]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Writer-Lazy.html Writable state] - i.e. log to a state buffer
* [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/New_monads/MonadSupply Unique supply]
+
* [http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/New_monads/MonadSupply A supply of unique values] - useful for e.g. guids or unique variable names
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Monad-ST.html ST]
+
* [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Monad-ST.html ST - memory-only, locally-encapsulated mutable variables]. Safely embed mutable state inside pure functions.
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-State.html State]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-State-Lazy.html Global state] - a scoped, mutable state.
* [http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/New_monads/MonadUndo Undoable state]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/Hedi/latest/doc/html/Undo.html Undoable state effects] - roll back state changes
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Monad-Instances.html Function application]
+
* [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Control-Monad-Instances.html#t:Monad Function application] - chains of function application.
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-Error.html Error]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Error.html Functions which may error] - track location and causes of errors.
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/stm/Control-Monad-STM.html Atomic memory transactions]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/stm/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-STM.html Atomic memory transactions] - software transactional memory
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-Cont.html Continuations]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/mtl/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Cont.html Continuations] - computations which can be interrupted and resumed.
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/System-IO.html#t%3AIO IO]
+
* [http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/System-IO.html#t%3AIO IO] - unrestricted side effects on the world
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/level-monad/0.4.1/doc/html/Control-Monad-Levels.html Search monad] - bfs and dfs search environments.
* [http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Sudoku Non-deterministic evaluation]
 
* [http://haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/mtl/Control-Monad-List.html List monad]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/stream-monad/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Stream.html non-determinism] - interleave computations with suspension.
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/stepwise/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Stepwise.html stepwise computation] - encode non-deterministic choices as stepwise deterministic ones
* [http://www.math.chalmers.se/~koen/pubs/entry-jfp99-monad.html Concurrent threads]
 
* [http://logic.csci.unt.edu/tarau/research/PapersHTML/monadic.html Backtracking]
+
* [http://logic.csci.unt.edu/tarau/research/PapersHTML/monadic.html Backtracking computations]
* [http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/fluet/research/rgn-monad/index.html Region allocation]
+
* [http://www.cs.cornell.edu/people/fluet/research/rgn-monad/index.html Region allocation effects]
* [http://okmij.org/ftp/Computation/monads.html#LogicT LogicT: backtracking monad transformer with fair operations and pruning]
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/logict/0.5.0.2/doc/html/Control-Monad-Logic.html LogicT] - backtracking monad transformer with fair operations and pruning
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/monad-task/latest/doc/html/Control-Monad-Task.html concurrent events and threads] - refactor event and callback heavy programs into straight-line code via co-routines
* [http://tsukimi.agusa.i.is.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~sydney/PiMonad/ Pi calculus as a monad]
 
* [http://www.haskell.org/halfs/ Halfs], uses a read-only and write-only monad for filesystem work.
+
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/QIO QIO] - The Quantum computing monad
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/full-sessions/latest/doc/html/Control-Concurrent-FullSession.html Pi calculus] - a monad for Pi-calculus style concurrent programming
* House's H monad for safe hardware access
 
  +
* [http://www-fp.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~kh/papers/pasco94/subsubsectionstar3_3_2_3.html Commutable monads for parallel programming]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/stream-monad Simple, Fair and Terminating Backtracking Monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/control-monad-exception Typed exceptions with call traces as a monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/control-monad-omega Breadth first list monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/control-monad-queue Continuation-based queues as monads]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/full-sessions Typed network protocol monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/level-monad Non-Determinism Monad for Level-Wise Search]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/monad-tx Transactional state monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/monadiccp A constraint programming monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/ProbabilityMonads A probability distribution monad]
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/set-monad Sets] - Set computations
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/http-monad/ HTTP] - http connections as a monadic environment
  +
* [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/monad-memo Memoization] - add memoization to code
   
 
There are many more interesting instance of the monad abstraction out there. Please add them as you come across each species.
 
There are many more interesting instance of the monad abstraction out there. Please add them as you come across each species.
Line 205: Line 222:
 
==Fun==
 
==Fun==
   
* If you are tired of monads, you can easily [http://saxophone.jpberlin.de/MonadTransformer?source=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Ehaskell%2Eorg%2Fhaskellwiki%2FCategory%3AMonad&language=English get rid of them].
+
* If you are tired of monads, you can easily [http://www.haskell.org.monadtransformer.parallelnetz.de/haskellwiki/Category:Monad get rid of them].
  +
  +
==See also==
  +
  +
* [[What a Monad is not]]
  +
* [[Monads as containers]]
 
* [[Monads as computation]]
  +
* [[Monad/ST]]
 
* [http://www.haskellforall.com/2012/06/you-could-have-invented-free-monads.html Why free monads matter] (blog article)
   
[[Category:Standard classes]] [[Category:Monad]]
+
[[Category:Monad|*]]

Revision as of 07:06, 27 March 2017

Monad class (base)
import Control.Monad

Monads in Haskell can be thought of as composable computation descriptions. The essence of monad is thus separation of composition timeline from the composed computation's execution timeline, as well as the ability of computation to implicitly carry extra data, as pertaining to the computation itself, in addition to its one (hence the name) output, that it will produce when run (or queried, or called upon). This lends monads to supplementing pure calculations with features like I/O, common environment or state, etc.

Each monad, or computation type, provides means, subject to Monad Laws, to (a) create a description of computation action that will produce (a.k.a. "return") a given Haskell value, (b) somehow run a computation action description (possibly getting its output back into Haskell should the monad choose to allow it, if computations described by the monad are pure, or causing the prescribed side effects if it's not), and (c) combine (a.k.a. "bind") a computation action description with a reaction to it – a regular Haskell function of one argument (that will receive computation-produced value) returning another action description (using or dependent on that value, if need be) – thus creating a combined computation action description that will feed the original action's output through the reaction while automatically taking care of the particulars of the computational process itself. A monad might also define additional primitives to provide access to and/or enable manipulation of data it implicitly carries, specific to its nature.

# Monad Laws in pseudo code
(a)     reaction            $     value    ==> action_description

(c)     action_description `bind` reaction ==> action_description

(b) run action_description                 ==> value

Thus in Haskell, though it is a purely-functional language, side effects that will be performed by a computation can be dealt with and combined purely at the monad's composition time. Monads thus resemble programs in a particular DSL. While programs may describe impure effects and actions outside Haskell, they can still be combined and processed ("assembled") purely, inside Haskell, creating a pure Haskell value - a computation action description that describes an impure calculation. That is how Monads in Haskell separate between the pure and the impure.

The computation doesn't have to be impure and can be pure itself as well. Then monads serve to provide the benefits of separation of concerns, and automatic creation of a computational "pipeline". Because they are very useful in practice but rather mind-twisting for the beginners, numerous tutorials that deal exclusively with monads were created (see monad tutorials).

Common monads

Most common applications of monads include:

  • Representing failure using Maybe monad
  • Nondeterminism using List monad to represent carrying multiple values
  • State using State monad
  • Read-only environment using Reader monad
  • I/O using IO monad

Monad class

Monads can be viewed as a standard programming interface to various data or control structures, which is captured by the Monad class. All common monads are members of it:

class Monad m where
  (>>=)  :: m a -> (  a -> m b) -> m b
  (>>)   :: m a ->  m b         -> m b
  return ::   a                 -> m a
  fail   :: String -> m a

In addition to implementing the class functions, all instances of Monad should obey the following equations, or Monad Laws:

return a >>= k                  =  k a
m        >>= return             =  m
m        >>= (\x -> k x >>= h)  =  (m >>= k) >>= h

See this intuitive explanation of why they should obey the Monad laws. It basically says that monad's reactions should be associative under Kleisli composition, defined as (f >=> g) x = f x >>= g, with return its left and right identity element.

Any Monad can be made a Functor by defining

fmap ab ma = ma >>= (return . ab)

However, the Functor class is not a superclass of the Monad class. See Functor hierarchy proposal.

Special notation

In order to improve the look of code that uses monads Haskell provides a special syntactic sugar called do-notation. For example, the following expression:

thing1 >>= (\x -> func1 x >>= (\y -> thing2 
       >>= (\_ -> func2 y >>= (\z -> return z))))

which can be written more clearly by breaking it into several lines and omitting parentheses:

thing1 >>= \x ->
func1 x >>= \y ->
thing2 >>= \_ ->
func2 y >>= \z ->
return z

This can also be written using the do-notation as follows:

do
  x <- thing1
  y <- func1 x
  thing2
  z <- func2 y
  return z

Code written using do-notation is transformed by the compiler to ordinary expressions that use the functions from the Monad class.

When using do-notation and a monad like State or IO programs look very much like programs written in an imperative language as each line contains a statement that can change the simulated global state of the program and optionally binds a (local) variable that can be used by the statements later in the code block.

It is possible to intermix the do-notation with regular notation.

More on do-notation can be found in a section of Monads as computation and in other tutorials.

Commutative monads

Commutative monads are monads for which the order of actions makes no difference (they commute), that is when following code:

do
  a <- actA
  b <- actB
  m a b

is the same as:

do
  b <- actB
  a <- actA
  m a b

Examples of commutative include:

  • Reader monad
  • Maybe monad

Monad tutorials

Monads are known for being deeply confusing to lots of people, so there are plenty of tutorials specifically related to monads. Each takes a different approach to Monads, and hopefully everyone will find something useful.

See the Monad tutorials timeline for a comprehensive list of monad tutorials.

Monad reference guides

An explanation of the basic Monad functions, with examples, can be found in the reference guide A tour of the Haskell Monad functions, by Henk-Jan van Tuyl.

Monad research

A collection of research papers about monads.

Monads in other languages

Implementations of monads in other languages.

Unfinished:

And possibly there exist:

  • Standard ML (via modules?)

Please add them if you know of other implementations.

Collection of links to monad implementations in various languages. on Lambda The Ultimate.

Interesting monads

A list of monads for various evaluation strategies and games:

There are many more interesting instance of the monad abstraction out there. Please add them as you come across each species.

Fun

See also