Difference between revisions of "MonadPlus"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 25: Line 25:
   
 
[http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/work/jeremy.gibbons/publications/tactics.pdf Martin & Gibbons] choose '''Monoid''', '''Left Zero''', and '''Left Distribution'''. This makes <tt>[]</tt> a MonadPlus, but not <tt>Maybe</tt> or <tt>IO</tt>.
 
[http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/work/jeremy.gibbons/publications/tactics.pdf Martin & Gibbons] choose '''Monoid''', '''Left Zero''', and '''Left Distribution'''. This makes <tt>[]</tt> a MonadPlus, but not <tt>Maybe</tt> or <tt>IO</tt>.
  +
  +
== What should be done? ==
  +
  +
It is proposed that the class be separated into MonadZero, MonadPlus, MonadOr. See [[MonadPlus reform proposal]].
   
 
[[Category:Standard classes]]
 
[[Category:Standard classes]]

Revision as of 23:19, 15 January 2006

MonadPlus class (base)
import Control.Monad

The MonadPlus class is defined like this:

class (Monad m) => MonadPlus m where
  mzero :: m a
  mplus :: m a -> m a -> m a

The precise set of rules that MonadPlus should obey is not agreed upon.

  • Monoidmplus and mzero form a monoid:
mplus mzero a = a
mplus a mzero = a
mplus (mplus a b) c = mplus a (mplus b c)
  • Left Zeromzero is a left zero for >>=:
mzero >>= k = mzero
  • Left Distribution:
mplus a b >>= k = mplus (a >>= k) (b >>= k)
  • Left Catch — this is rarely advocated, but Maybe and IO satisfy this as an alternative to Left Distribution.
mplus (return a) b = return a

Which rules?

Martin & Gibbons choose Monoid, Left Zero, and Left Distribution. This makes [] a MonadPlus, but not Maybe or IO.

What should be done?

It is proposed that the class be separated into MonadZero, MonadPlus, MonadOr. See MonadPlus reform proposal.