# Difference between revisions of "Num instance for functions"

From HaskellWiki

(Categroy:FAQ) |
(Category:FAQ, misspelling reflected the change precisely, but it was not the intended one) |
||

Line 33: | Line 33: | ||

[[Category:Humor]] | [[Category:Humor]] | ||

[[Category:Proposals]] | [[Category:Proposals]] | ||

− | [[ | + | [[Category:FAQ]] |

## Revision as of 15:34, 18 December 2007

Some people have argued, that `Num`

instances of `(->)`

would be nice in order
to add functions nicely, say for

```
f, g :: Num a => b -> a
```

you would define

```
(f+g) x = f x + g x
```

With an according definition of `fromInteger`

```
fromInteger = const
```

numeric literals would also denote constant functions. This allows

```
f+2 == \x -> f x + 2
```

.

Even nicer, the mathematically established notation of omitting the multiplication dot

```
2(x+y) :: Integer
```

will now be parsed by a Haskell compiler to the most obvious meaning

```
2 :: Integer
```

! :-)

## Note

This article is in category Proposals in order to show people that this idea was already proposed, but that one should think twice implementing it. There should be a category Counterproposals.