Difference between revisions of "Research papers"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Clarify entry)
m ("DoHaskell" link dead)
(21 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
[[Category:Research]]
⚫
A lot of documentation exists about Haskell, and its foundations, in the form of research papers written by those investigating language design. And it is this enormous research effort that goes into making Haskell such a sane language. In general, if a feature is not well understood, it isn't going to become part of the language.
 
  +
  +
__NOTOC__
  +
  ⚫
A lot of documentation exists about Haskell, and its foundations, in the form of research papers written by those investigating language design. An enormous research effort, by hundreds of researchers over the past 20 years, has gone into making Haskell such a great language. In general, if a feature is not well understood, it isn't going to become part of the language.
   
 
Here is a selection of those papers, with the goal of making the wealth of material published on Haskell more available to the casual user, and not just researchers. Some of the papers are highly technical, others, not so. These papers are not suitable for those trying to learn the language from scratch, but more for those looking for a deeper understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects of Haskell.
  
Here is a selection of those papers, with the goal of making the wealth of material published on Haskell more available to the casual user, and not just researchers. Some of the papers are highly technical, others, not so. These papers are not suitable for those trying to learn the language from scratch, but more for those looking for a deeper understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects of Haskell.
  +
  +
There are E-reader-friendly versions of many PDFs available at [https://github.com/beerendlauwers/haskell-papers-ereader this Github repository].
   
 
==Overview==
  
==Overview==
   
−
;[http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html Why Functional Programming Matters]
+
;[http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/dat/miranda/whyfp90.pdf Why Functional Programming Matters] ∷ PDF
 
:John Hughes. Comput. J. 32(2): 98-107 (1989)
  
:John Hughes. Comput. J. 32(2): 98-107 (1989)
−  
−
;[http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/papers/hot/hot.ps.gz A HOT opportunity]
  
−
:Philip Wadler. Journal of Functional Programming, 7(2):127--128, March 1997.
  
−  
⚫
;[http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/Papers/haskell-retrospective/index.htm Wearing the hair shirt: a retrospective on Haskell]
  
−
:Simon Peyton Jones. Slides of an invited talk at POPL'03.
  
   
 
;[http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/1997/224/index.html Higher-order + Polymorphic = Reusable]
  
;[http://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/pubs/1997/224/index.html Higher-order + Polymorphic = Reusable]
 
:Simon Thompson, 1997.
  
:Simon Thompson, 1997.
  +
  ⚫
;[http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/papers/history-of-haskell/index.htm The History of Haskell]
  +
:Simon Peyton Jones, Paul Hudak, John Hughes, and Philip Wadler, 2006
   
 
==Categories==
  
==Categories==
   
 
*[[/Runtime systems|Runtime systems]]
  
*[[/Runtime systems|Runtime systems]]
  +
*[[/Parallelism and concurrency|Parallelism and concurrency]]
 
*[[/Compilation|Compilation]]
  
*[[/Compilation|Compilation]]
 
*[[/Type systems|Type systems]]
  
*[[/Type systems|Type systems]]
Line 25: Line 29:
 
*[[/Monads and arrows|Monads and arrows]]
  
*[[/Monads and arrows|Monads and arrows]]
 
*[[/Generics|Generic programming]]
  
*[[/Generics|Generic programming]]
−
*[[/Testing and correctness|Testing and correctness]]
 +
*[[/Testing and correctness|Proofs, verification and testing]]
−
*[[/Program development|Applications]]
 +
*[[/Program development|Software application development]]
 
*[[/Domain specific languages|Domain specific languages]]
  
*[[/Domain specific languages|Domain specific languages]]
 
*[[/Functional reactive programming|Functional reactive programming]]
  
*[[/Functional reactive programming|Functional reactive programming]]
  +
*[[/Functional pearls|Functional pearls: beautiful design]]
  +
  +
== Authors ==
  +
[[/Authors|Authors Index]]
  +
  +
== Top 10 ==
   
  +
[[/Top_10|Most cited]] Haskell papers
−
See also [http://haskell.readscheme.org/ haskell.readscheme.org]
  

Revision as of 03:36, 5 October 2021



A lot of documentation exists about Haskell, and its foundations, in the form of research papers written by those investigating language design. An enormous research effort, by hundreds of researchers over the past 20 years, has gone into making Haskell such a great language. In general, if a feature is not well understood, it isn't going to become part of the language.

Here is a selection of those papers, with the goal of making the wealth of material published on Haskell more available to the casual user, and not just researchers. Some of the papers are highly technical, others, not so. These papers are not suitable for those trying to learn the language from scratch, but more for those looking for a deeper understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects of Haskell.

There are E-reader-friendly versions of many PDFs available at this Github repository.

Overview

Why Functional Programming Matters ∷ PDF
John Hughes. Comput. J. 32(2): 98-107 (1989)
Higher-order + Polymorphic = Reusable
Simon Thompson, 1997.
The History of Haskell
Simon Peyton Jones, Paul Hudak, John Hughes, and Philip Wadler, 2006

Categories

Authors

Authors Index

Top 10

Most cited Haskell papers

Retrieved from "https://wiki.haskell.org/index.php?title=Research_papers&oldid=64772"