Difference between revisions of "Research papers"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(start on attempt to rank in terms of popularity)
Line 28: Line 28:
*[[/Functional reactive programming|Functional reactive programming]]
*[[/Functional reactive programming|Functional reactive programming]]
==[[/Authors|Authors Index]]==
== Authors ==
[[/Authors|Authors Index]]
== Top 10 ==
[[/Top_10|Most cited]] Haskell papers
See also [http://haskell.readscheme.org/ haskell.readscheme.org]
See also [http://haskell.readscheme.org/ haskell.readscheme.org]

Revision as of 05:49, 18 September 2006

A lot of documentation exists about Haskell, and its foundations, in the form of research papers written by those investigating language design. And it is this enormous research effort that goes into making Haskell such a sane language. In general, if a feature is not well understood, it isn't going to become part of the language.

Here is a selection of those papers, with the goal of making the wealth of material published on Haskell more available to the casual user, and not just researchers. Some of the papers are highly technical, others, not so. These papers are not suitable for those trying to learn the language from scratch, but more for those looking for a deeper understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects of Haskell.


Why Functional Programming Matters
John Hughes. Comput. J. 32(2): 98-107 (1989) (Cited by 357)
Higher-order + Polymorphic = Reusable
Simon Thompson, 1997. (Cited by 10)
The History of Haskell
Simon Peyton Jones, Paul Hudak, John Hughes, and Philip Wadler, 2006



Authors Index

Top 10

Most cited Haskell papers

See also haskell.readscheme.org