Search results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Page title matches
- I don't understand in what sense this IO definition is a "semantics". [[User:Conal|Conal]] 04:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Maybe so. Thanks. For a semantics, I think I'd want a lot more equalities than the representation by itself p1 KB (179 words) - 04:22, 19 February 2010
- * For simplicity, the examples here only gives semantics for teletype I/O. * These are only some of the various ways to describe the semantics of </i><code>IO a</code><i>; your actual implementation may vary.11 KB (1,628 words) - 10:36, 5 April 2024
- Is the opposite of ... yeah guess what? ... the opposite of [[non-strict semantics]]. [[Strict semantics]] is used e.g. in [[OCaml]] and [[LISP]].363 bytes (53 words) - 15:18, 6 February 2021
- ...nate successfully, precisely because || has non-strict ("short-circuited") semantics in C.259 bytes (40 words) - 18:02, 28 November 2011
- The semantics of LGtk is given by a reference implementation. ...be implemented efficiently? Although this question is not relevant for the semantics, we will see that there is an efficient implementation with <hask>MVar</has16 KB (2,699 words) - 23:00, 7 June 2013
- 2 KB (232 words) - 17:07, 7 May 2012
- ...non-strict semantics by default: nearly every other language has [[strict semantics]], in which if any subexpression fails to have a value, the whole expressio ...guage uses innermost-first evaluation, it correspondingly must have strict semantics.9 KB (1,503 words) - 13:55, 15 December 2019
- #REDIRECT [[Non-strict semantics]]34 bytes (3 words) - 21:29, 14 September 2013
Page text matches
File:RodinV08-xmax-exe-surse.zip ...ems. From the lazy evaluation, from the semantics, from the GHC , from the semantics implementation ? ? Anyway, please do not try to use a ”pentru” (en. for(337 KB) - 23:42, 10 October 2008- == Semantics of beside == The semantics of <code>beside</code>---and hence also of <code>(|||)</code> and <code>(==3 KB (570 words) - 03:31, 6 March 2012
- Is the opposite of ... yeah guess what? ... the opposite of [[non-strict semantics]]. [[Strict semantics]] is used e.g. in [[OCaml]] and [[LISP]].363 bytes (53 words) - 15:18, 6 February 2021
- #REDIRECT [[Non-strict semantics]]34 bytes (3 words) - 21:29, 14 September 2013
- ...ld be reflected in the notation. This got me thinking a bit more about the semantics. ...when an exception is thrown. The paper includes the slightly different STM semantics in which <math>\Delta</math> is built as redundant record of allocation eff3 KB (497 words) - 19:06, 11 February 2008
- I don't understand in what sense this IO definition is a "semantics". [[User:Conal|Conal]] 04:49, 12 December 2008 (UTC) Maybe so. Thanks. For a semantics, I think I'd want a lot more equalities than the representation by itself p1 KB (179 words) - 04:22, 19 February 2010
- ...nate successfully, precisely because || has non-strict ("short-circuited") semantics in C.259 bytes (40 words) - 18:02, 28 November 2011
- '''Eager evaluation''' is an implementation of the [[strict semantics]] as can be found in [[OCaml]] and usually in [[imperative language]]s. A k207 bytes (30 words) - 08:26, 29 November 2007
- ...lthough Backpack is geared toward integration into Haskell, its design and semantics are largely agnostic with respect to the details of the underlying core lan2 KB (285 words) - 13:42, 16 March 2018
- ...hat'' a Haskell program computes, is called [[Non-strict semantics]]. This semantics allows one to bypass undefined values (e.g. results of infinite loops) and ...How it works, how it makes code more modular, how it relates to non-strict semantics, and other things.2 KB (291 words) - 15:20, 6 February 2021
- Some people argue that syntax is less important than semantics.26 members (0 subcategories, 0 files) - 09:49, 13 January 2007
- <br>[http://csg.csail.mit.edu/6.827/handouts/L19-BS5-Semantics.pdf] L19-BS5-Semantics.pdf<br>28-Nov-2006 11:14<br>144K<br> ...br>[http://csg.csail.mit.edu/6.827/handouts/L19-BS5-Semantics.ppt] L19-BS5-Semantics.ppt<br>28-Nov-2006 11:12<br>0<br>5 KB (746 words) - 16:08, 13 March 2011
- Parsec already has operators <tt>(<|>)</tt> and <tt>choice</tt> with fitting semantics. Simply calling <tt>morelse (<|>)</tt> and <tt>mchoice choice</tt> might b517 bytes (82 words) - 12:17, 20 January 2006
- ...icit XReference types. Due to the immutable core (and Haskell's non-strict semantics), I think we can do without them and directly put the types there.380 bytes (56 words) - 10:29, 10 September 2012
- Interests: Virtual worlds, formal semantics of programming languages, programming language theory, algorithms615 bytes (77 words) - 02:46, 20 November 2008
File:Paper-v5.sxw ...f the programmer. A new vision of monadic semantics is now introduced. The semantics is not a function:interp :: Term -> Environment -> Monad but more likely a(328 KB) - 08:40, 10 January 2009- ...ki.haskell.org/index.php?title=Non-strict_semantics&oldid=63164 Non-strict semantics]961 bytes (127 words) - 14:45, 15 December 2019
- ...ver, the language specification simply states that Haskell is [[Non-strict semantics|non-strict]], which is not quite the same thing as [[lazy evaluation|lazy]] [[Non-strict semantics|Non-strictness]] means that [[reduction]] (the mathematical term for [[eval4 KB (643 words) - 23:33, 5 April 2021
- 0. Semantics Semantics,4 KB (583 words) - 10:26, 26 December 2017
- ==Semantics== A statement in a do-block may be replaced by a more-notation. Semantics of more-declarations becomes as follows:9 KB (1,472 words) - 19:55, 16 September 2011