Difference between revisions of "Talk:Haskell"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
:The logo seems to be well established as the "Haskell" logo. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 14:42, 11 January 2006 (EST)
 
:The logo seems to be well established as the "Haskell" logo. —[[User:Ashley Y|Ashley Y]] 14:42, 11 January 2006 (EST)
   
::That doesn't change anything. In fact, it makes it worse! Appearances matter, if someone who doesn't know Haskell comes here, sees an amateurish web and logo design, they may not consider Haskell a "real" langauge, but rather an amateurish effort not suited for real work. In fact I'd prefer an approach similar to e.g. the ruby web site (no logo at ll). --[[User:SebastianSylvan|SebastianSylvan]] 03:49, 12 January 2006 (EST)
+
::That doesn't change anything. In fact, it makes it worse! Appearances matter, if someone who doesn't know Haskell comes here, sees an amateurish web and logo design, they may not consider Haskell a "real" langauge, but rather an amateurish effort not suited for real work. In fact I'd prefer an approach similar to e.g. the ruby web site (no logo at all, rather than an amateurish logo). --[[User:SebastianSylvan|SebastianSylvan]] 03:49, 12 January 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 09:07, 12 January 2006

This is currently just made to look like http://haskell.org/. I expect we will want to change it later. —Ashley Y 21:58, 9 January 2006 (EST)

IMO the logo and design looks very amateurish. Are there no Haskell programmers with some experience in graphic design? Or maybe someone who knows someone? --SebastianSylvan 13:06, 11 January 2006 (EST)

The logo seems to be well established as the "Haskell" logo. —Ashley Y 14:42, 11 January 2006 (EST)
That doesn't change anything. In fact, it makes it worse! Appearances matter, if someone who doesn't know Haskell comes here, sees an amateurish web and logo design, they may not consider Haskell a "real" langauge, but rather an amateurish effort not suited for real work. In fact I'd prefer an approach similar to e.g. the ruby web site (no logo at all, rather than an amateurish logo). --SebastianSylvan 03:49, 12 January 2006 (EST)