Difference between revisions of "Talk:Literate programming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(:: -> \coloncolon) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== :: -> \coloncolon == |
== :: -> \coloncolon == |
||
| − | In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package colonequals which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus {::}{{\coloncolon}}1 would replace it |
+ | In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package "colonequals" which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus <nowiki>{::}{{\coloncolon}}1</nowiki> would replace it using listings. Should we add that too? -- [[User:Lambdor|lambdor]] 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:14, 24 August 2010
Bird Style
I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [1]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. tanimoto 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
:: -> \coloncolon
In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package "colonequals" which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus {::}{{\coloncolon}}1 would replace it using listings. Should we add that too? -- lambdor 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)