Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Monad.Reader"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 29: Line 29:
 
--[[User:Yang|Yang]] 17:04, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 
--[[User:Yang|Yang]] 17:04, 5 March 2007 (EST)
 
Great publication, keep them coming! Please consider setting up an RSS/Atom/etc. feed for this.
 
Great publication, keep them coming! Please consider setting up an RSS/Atom/etc. feed for this.
  +
  +
Any chance of an HTML version (no matter how lame the results of an automated PDF2HTML might be)?

Revision as of 19:19, 6 June 2007

I'd welcome any feedback and discussion about The Monad.Reader. Don't like the class file? Love the articles? Shout it out! --WouterSwierstra 10:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)


The layout

I think the twosided should be dropped from the latex class file, that would make it a lot more pleasant to read on a screen.

--Twanvl 13:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Although those of use with wide screens quite like putting the pdf up in 2-page side-by-side mode in which the twosided option looks better!

--Pharm 11:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC) (I have an ordinary 4:3 screen at home though. TBH the twosided thing doesn't bother me either way...)

--Mnislaih 13:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Wow! This issue of TMR is excellent. I am loving the tutorial style of all the three articles. Right now I'm in section 2 of Russell's excellent assembler and found that the newtype definition for the AssemblyCodeMonad needs to be:

newtype AssemblyCodeMonad a = 
  AssemblyCodeMonad
     (RWS [(Label,Location)]
          [Either (Instruction Register) (Label,Location)]
          (Location, Integer)
          a)
  deriving (Monad, MonadReader [(Label,Location)], 
                MonadWriter [Either (Instruction Register) (Label,Location)],
                MonadState (Location, Integer))

--Yang 17:04, 5 March 2007 (EST) Great publication, keep them coming! Please consider setting up an RSS/Atom/etc. feed for this.

Any chance of an HTML version (no matter how lame the results of an automated PDF2HTML might be)?