Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dag"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
(→Spam: new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
::Thanks. I had wondered about using <hask> tags; now we know. =) I added a note to the [[Talk:Typeclassopedia|talk page]] recording the reasons for having things the way they are, for the benefit of future editors. --[[User:Byorgey|Byorgey]] 01:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
::Thanks. I had wondered about using <hask> tags; now we know. =) I added a note to the [[Talk:Typeclassopedia|talk page]] recording the reasons for having things the way they are, for the benefit of future editors. --[[User:Byorgey|Byorgey]] 01:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | == Spam == |
||
| + | |||
| + | I know you are trying to help, but moving stuff around actually makes it more difficult for me. --[[User:Gwern|Gwern]] 16:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:59, 21 December 2011
Hi Dag,
Can we just revert all of the <hask> tags in the Typeclassopedia? I'm glad we did the experiment, but the formatting is messed up in a lot of places, and the syntax highlighting simply looks bad because it's inconsistent (see e.g. the highighting of Monad vs. Applicative, the highlighting of &&&, etc.).
--Byorgey 01:44, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed, done. --Dag 01:52, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Spam
I know you are trying to help, but moving stuff around actually makes it more difficult for me. --Gwern 16:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)