Open research problems
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Efficiency of lazy functional languages
This is a problem that came up during IRC discussions. We consider a purely functional language L:
- By "purely functional" we mean a language that has value semantics; that is, there is no function such that after evaluation of the function the value that was referred to by something else changed. (Also known as "No Side Effects").
- A value is "changed" when it is not the case during an evaluation that when the old value and the new value would both be fully evaluated, there wouldn't be the same result. This should make sure that laziness is allowed in the purely functional language.
Can purely functional languages like L can implement all algorithms that can be implemented in a language like C as efficiently in an amortized sense, ignoring space-usage?
- See the I/O problem.
Implement encapsulated-state interface entirely in Haskell (no primitives)
Control.Monad.ST.runSTwithout using the built-in monadic
IOtypes. This needs to happen with operations that all run in O(1) amortized time.