Difference between revisions of "Euler problems/171 to 180"
(rm copyvio) |
|||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
Counting the number of "hollow" square laminae that can form one, two, three, ... distinct arrangements. |
Counting the number of "hollow" square laminae that can form one, two, three, ... distinct arrangements. |
||
− | Solution: This was my C++ code, published here without my permission nor any attribution, shame on whoever put it here. [user:henk263|henk263] |
+ | Solution: This was my C++ code, published here without my permission nor any attribution, shame on whoever put it here. [[user:henk263|henk263]] |
== [http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problems&id=175 Problem 175] == |
== [http://projecteuler.net/index.php?section=problems&id=175 Problem 175] == |
Revision as of 10:24, 24 February 2008
Problem 171
Finding numbers for which the sum of the squares of the digits is a square.
Solution:
This does not seem Haskell code to me.
If the argument: Learning Haskell were valid pure Haskell code would have been given.
#include <stdio.h>
static int result = 0;
#define digits 20
static long long fact[digits+1];
static const long long precision = 1000000000;
static const long long precision_mult = 111111111;
#define maxsquare 64 /* must be a power of 2 > digits * 9^2 */
static inline int issquare( int n )
{
for( int step = maxsquare/2, i = step;;)
{
if( i*i == n ) return i;
if( !( step >>= 1 ) ) return -1;
if( i*i > n ) i -= step;
else i += step;
}
}
static inline void dodigit( int d, int nr, int sum, long long c, int s )
{
if( d )
for( int n = 0; n <= nr; c *= ++n, s += d, sum += d*d )
dodigit( d-1, nr - n, sum, c, s );
else if( issquare( sum ) > 0 )
result = ( s * ( fact[digits] / ( c * fact[nr] ) )
/ digits % precision * precision_mult
+ result ) % precision;
}
int main( void )
{
fact[0] = 1;
for( int i = 1; i < digits+1; i++ ) fact[i] = fact[i-1]*i;
dodigit( 9, digits, 0, 1, 0 );
printf( "%d\n", result );
return 0;
}
problem_171 = main
Problem 172
Investigating numbers with few repeated digits.
Solution:
factorial n = product [1..toInteger n]
fallingFactorial x n = product [x - fromInteger i | i <- [0..toInteger n - 1] ]
choose n k = fallingFactorial n k `div` factorial k
-- how many numbers can we get having d digits and p positions
p172 0 _ = 0
p172 d p
| p < 4 = d^p
| otherwise =
(p172' p) + p*(p172' (p-1)) + (choose p 2)*(p172' (p-2)) + (choose p 3)*(p172' (p-3))
where
p172' = p172 (d-1)
problem_172= (p172 10 18) * 9 `div` 10
Problem 173
Using up to one million tiles how many different "hollow" square laminae can be formed? Solution:
problem_173=
let c=div (10^6) 4
xm=floor$sqrt $fromIntegral c
k=[div c x|x<-[1..xm]]
in sum k-(div (xm*(xm+1)) 2)
Problem 174
Counting the number of "hollow" square laminae that can form one, two, three, ... distinct arrangements.
Solution: This was my C++ code, published here without my permission nor any attribution, shame on whoever put it here. henk263
Problem 175
Fractions involving the number of different ways a number can be expressed as a sum of powers of 2. Solution:
sternTree x 0=[]
sternTree x y=
m:sternTree y n
where
(m,n)=divMod x y
findRat x y
|odd l=take (l-1) k++[last k-1,1]
|otherwise=k
where
k=sternTree x y
l=length k
p175 x y=
init$foldl (++) "" [a++","|
a<-map show $reverse $filter (/=0)$findRat x y]
problems_175=p175 123456789 987654321
test=p175 13 17
Problem 176
Rectangular triangles that share a cathetus. Solution:
--k=47547
--2*k+1=95095 = 5*7*11*13*19
lst=[5,7,11,13,19]
primes=[2,3,5,7,11]
problem_176 =
product[a^b|(a,b)<-zip primes (reverse n)]
where
la=div (last lst+1) 2
m=map (\x->div x 2)$init lst
n=m++[la]
Problem 177
Integer angled Quadrilaterals.
Solution:
This does not seem Haskell code to me.
If the argument: Learning Haskell were valid pure Haskell code would have been given.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
// gcc --std c99 -lm 177.c
int isint(double x);
double fabs(double x);
long long int count;
double duparray[100][20];
double PIeight=3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510/180.0;
int main()
{
double x,w,m;
int a,b,c,d;
double maxxvalue;
int iopt;
int I,j;
int N;
count=0;
double sine[200];
double cosine[200];
for(int i=1;i<=180;i++)
{
if(i<=90)
{
sine[i]=sin(PIeight*(double)i);
cosine[i]=cos(PIeight*(double)i);
}
else
{
sine[i]=sine[180-i];
cosine[i]=-cosine[180-i];
}
}
for(int alpha=1;alpha<=45;alpha++)
{
for(int beta=alpha;beta<180-alpha;beta++)
{
for(int gamma=alpha;gamma<=180-alpha-beta-alpha;gamma++)
{
w=sine[alpha+beta]/sine[alpha+beta+gamma];
int b=180-alpha-beta-gamma;
for(int delta=alpha;delta<=180-gamma-beta-alpha;delta++)
{
x=sine[beta]/sine[beta+gamma+delta];
m=sqrt(w*w+x*x-2*w*x*cosine[delta]);
if(x*sine[delta]>m)
a=90;
else
a=(int)(round)(1.0/PIeight*asin(x*sine[delta]/m));
if(m*m+w*w-x*x<0)
a=180-a;
d=180-beta-gamma-delta;
c=360-a-b-alpha-beta-gamma-delta-d;
if(a>=alpha && c>=alpha && a+b+c+d+alpha+beta+gamma+delta==360)
{
if(fabs((sine[delta]*sine[c]/(sine[a]*sine[d]))-
(sine[gamma]*sine[alpha]/(sine[beta]*sine[b])))<1e-11)
{
duparray[1][1]=(double)alpha;
duparray[1][2]=(double)beta;
duparray[1][3]=(double)gamma;
duparray[1][4]=(double)delta;
duparray[1][5]=(double)d;
duparray[1][6]=(double)c;
duparray[1][7]=(double)a;
duparray[1][8]=(double)b;
for(I=1;I<=3;I++)
for(j=1;j<=8;j++)
duparray[I+1][j]=duparray[1][(j+I*2-1)%8+1];
for(j=1;j<=8;j++)
duparray[5][9-j]=duparray[1][j];
for(I=1;I<=3;I++)
for(j=1;j<=8;j++)
duparray[I+5][j]=duparray[5][(j+I*2-1)%8+1];
N=8;
maxxvalue=1e22;
iopt=1;
for(I=1;I<=N;I++)
{
duparray[I][9]=0;
for(j=1;j<=8;j++)
duparray[I][9]=duparray[I][9]*180+duparray[I][j];
if(duparray[I][9]<maxxvalue-1e-7)
{
maxxvalue=duparray[I][9];
iopt=I;
}
}
if(iopt==1)
count++;
}
}
}
}
}
}
printf("%lld\n",count);
}
problem_177 = main
Problem 178
Step Numbers Solution:
This does not seem Haskell code to me.
If the argument: Learning Haskell were valid pure Haskell code would have been given.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <math.h>
#define N 40
double f[50][11][11][11];
int main()
{
int x,y,z,i,j,k,m;
for(m=1;m<=N;m++)
{
for(i=0;i<=9;i++)
for(j=0;j<=9;j++)
for(k=0;k<=9;k++)
{
if(i==j && j==k && m==1)
f[m][i][j][k]=1;
else
f[m][i][j][k]=0;
}
}
for(m=2;m<=N;m++)
{
for(x=0;x<=9;x++)
{
for(y=x+1;y<=9;y++)
for(z=x;z<=y;z++)
{
if(z>x && z<y)
{
f[m][x][y][z]=f[m-1][x][y][z-1]+f[m-1][x][y][z+1];
}
if(z==x)
{
f[m][x][y][z]=f[m-1][x][y][x+1]+f[m-1][x+1][y][x+1];
}
if(z==y)
{
f[m][x][y][z]=f[m-1][x][y][y-1]+f[m-1][x][y-1][y-1];
}
}
}
}
double count=0;
for(i=1;i<=N;i++)
{
for(z=1;z<=9;z++)
count+=f[i][0][9][z];
}
printf("%lf\n",count);
}
problem_178 = main
Problem 179
Consecutive positive divisors.
Problem 180
Rational zeros of a function of three variables. Solution:
import Data.Ratio
{-
After some algebra, we find:
f1 n x y z = x^(n+1) + y^(n+1) - z^(n+1)
f2 n x y z = (x*y + y*z + z*x) * ( x^(n-1) + y^(n-1) - z^(n-1) )
f3 n x y z = x*y*z*( x^(n-2) + y^(n-2) - z^(n-2) )
f n x y z = f1 n x y z + f2 n x y z - f3 n x y z
f n x y z = (x+y+z) * (x^n+y^n-z^n)
Now the hard part comes in realizing that n can be negative.
Thanks to Fermat, we only need examine the cases n = [-2, -1, 1, 2]
Which leads to:
f(-2) z = xy/sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
f(-1) z = xy/(x+y)
f(1) z = x+y
f(2) z = sqrt(x^2 + y^2)
-}
unique :: Eq(a) => [a] -> [a]
unique [] = []
unique (x:xs) | elem x xs = unique xs
| otherwise = x : unique xs
-- Not quite correct, but I don't care about the zeros
ratSqrt :: Rational -> Rational
ratSqrt x =
let a = floor $ sqrt $ fromIntegral $ numerator x
b = floor $ sqrt $ fromIntegral $ denominator x
c = (a%b) * (a%b)
in if x == c then (a%b) else 0
-- Not quite correct, but I don't care about the zeros
reciprocal :: Rational -> Rational
reciprocal x
| x == 0 = 0
| otherwise = denominator x % numerator x
problem_180 =
let order = 35
range :: [Rational]
range = unique [ (a%b) | b <- [1..order], a <- [1..(b-1)] ]
fm2,fm1,f1,f2 :: [[Rational]]
fm2 = [[x,y,z] | x<-range, y<-range,
let z = x*y * reciprocal (ratSqrt(x*x+y*y)), elem z range]
fm1 = [[x,y,z] | x<-range, y<-range,
let z = x*y * reciprocal (x+y), elem z range]
f1 = [[x,y,z] | x<-range, y<-range,
let z = (x+y), elem z range]
f2 = [[x,y,z] | x<-range, y<-range,
let z = ratSqrt(x*x+y*y), elem z range]
result = sum $ unique $ map (\x -> sum x) (fm2++fm1++f1++f2)
in (numerator result + denominator result)