Difference between revisions of "Talk:Literate programming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(bird style) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047848.html]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. [[User:Tanimoto|tanimoto]] 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2008-September/047848.html]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. [[User:Tanimoto|tanimoto]] 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | == :: -> \coloncolon == |
||
+ | |||
+ | In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package "colonequals" which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus <nowiki>{::}{{\coloncolon}}1</nowiki> would replace it using listings. Should we add that too? -- [[User:Lambdor|lambdor]] 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:14, 24 August 2010
Bird Style
I just inserted a section on Bird style comments, mostly to point to the flag that relaxes the blank lines restriction. The discussion leading to this discovery can be found here [1]. It may arguably be better to keep the top sections generic, and leave these types of specific hints to the bottom. tanimoto 05:08, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
:: -> \coloncolon
In the Latex "oberdiek" bundle there is a package "colonequals" which provides the symbol \coloncolon, thus {::}{{\coloncolon}}1 would replace it using listings. Should we add that too? -- lambdor 14:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)