Difference between revisions of "Num instance for functions"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
.
(category Counterproposals?) |
(Categroy:FAQ) |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
[[Category:Humor]] |
[[Category:Humor]] |
||
[[Category:Proposals]] |
[[Category:Proposals]] |
||
+ | [[Categroy:FAQ]] |
Revision as of 14:21, 18 December 2007
Some people have argued, that Num
instances of (->)
would be nice in order
to add functions nicely, say for
f, g :: Num a => b -> a
you would define
(f+g) x = f x + g x
With an according definition of fromInteger
fromInteger = const
numeric literals would also denote constant functions. This allows
f+2 == \x -> f x + 2
Even nicer, the mathematically established notation of omitting the multiplication dot
2(x+y) :: Integer
will now be parsed by a Haskell compiler to the most obvious meaning
2 :: Integer
! :-)
Note
This article is in category Proposals in order to show people that this idea was already proposed, but that one should think twice implementing it. There should be a category Counterproposals.