Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...e are a few nits in the above implementation. It doesn't exactly match the semantics of the OCaml parser. For more information on this topic, see the linked mai
    25 KB (4,039 words) - 16:39, 12 March 2024
  • ...ariables. If this guess is wrong, an optimization can change the program's semantics! To avoid this kind of disaster, C optimizers are conservative in their gue * Is it possible to duplicate calls? In Haskell semantics - yes, but real compilers never duplicate work in such simple cases (otherw
    82 KB (13,140 words) - 09:07, 3 May 2024
  • The design and semantics of HdpH and HdpH-RS will be presented at the Haskell Sympo-
    22 KB (3,305 words) - 01:20, 30 September 2014
  • ...he language. The scope of the workshop includes all aspects of the design, semantics, theory, application, implementation, and teaching of Haskell.</p></li> ....1.0 vs. 2.0.1 include switching to Cabal, and slight changes to the error semantics.</p></li>
    78 KB (11,405 words) - 03:19, 11 February 2008
  • ...iativity law for <code>>>=</code>. Obeying the three laws ensures that the semantics of the do-notation using the monad will be consistent. ...s in other languages do not require them in Haskell, due to Haskell's lazy semantics.
    169 KB (26,629 words) - 13:40, 27 May 2024
  • However, that should not distract from its deerper OO semantics.
    30 KB (4,685 words) - 01:34, 14 July 2021
  • ...in detail at four case studies from different areas: programming language semantics, machine architectures, graphics and formal languages.
    31 KB (4,662 words) - 08:38, 20 April 2024
  • ...l programs tend to be shorter (usually between 2 to 10 times shorter). The semantics are most often a lot closer to the problem than an imperative version, whic
    33 KB (5,616 words) - 22:30, 3 May 2024
  • ...." ... "So monads are about talking about effects in the context of a pure semantics."
    35 KB (5,030 words) - 08:53, 12 June 2024
  • # Is it possible to duplicate calls? In Haskell semantics - yes, but real compilers never duplicate work in such simple cases (otherw in as much as either of those have any semantics at all.
    64 KB (6,046 words) - 11:23, 22 October 2022
  • semantics, but an extra set of coercion rules.
    41 KB (6,592 words) - 22:27, 3 May 2024
  • ...plementation of <code>(>>)</code>, it would not correspond to the intended semantics: the intention is that <code>m >> n</code> ignores the ''result'' of <code> ...code>maybeFix</code> has the right type, it does ''not'' have the intended semantics. If we think about how <code>(>>=)</code> works for the <code>Maybe</code>
    179 KB (29,519 words) - 16:10, 30 December 2022
  • ...replaces the (>>) that sequence_ folds into the list with different abort semantics
    133 KB (20,540 words) - 08:31, 13 December 2009
  • ...med, exceedingly technical device introduced to structure the denotational semantics has by now achieved cult status. It has been married to effects -- more tha
    55 KB (8,884 words) - 01:18, 10 November 2022
  • all aspects of the design, semantics, theory, application, implementation,
    93 KB (13,836 words) - 23:40, 14 August 2019

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)