Hask
From HaskellWiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Hask is not Cartesian closed) 
(→"Platonic" Hask) 

Line 130:  Line 130:  
== "Platonic" '''Hask''' ==  == "Platonic" '''Hask''' ==  
−  Because of these difficulties, Haskell developers tend to think in some subset of Haskell where types do not have bottom values. This means that it only includes functions that terminate, and typically only finite values. The corresponding category has the expected initial and terminal objects, sums and products  +  Because of these difficulties, Haskell developers tend to think in some subset of Haskell where types do not have bottom values. This means that it only includes functions that terminate, and typically only finite values. The corresponding category has the expected initial and terminal objects, sums and products, and instances of Functor and Monad really are endofunctors and monads. 
== Links ==  == Links == 
Revision as of 04:53, 6 September 2012
Hask is the category of Haskell types and functions.
The objects of Hask are Haskell types, and the morphisms from objectsA
B
A > B
A
id :: A
f
g
f . g = \x > f (g x)
Contents 
1 Is Hask even a category?
Consider:
undef1 = undefined :: a > b undef2 = \_ > undefined
Note that these are not the same value:
seq undef1 () = undefined seq undef2 () = ()
undef1 . id = undef2
f
g
f x = g x
x
undef1
undef2
2 Hask is not Cartesian closed
Actual Hask does not have sums, products, or an initial object, and()
Initial Object  Terminal Object  Sum  Product  Product  

Type  data Empty 
data () = () 
data Either a b = Left a  Right b 
data (a,b) = (,) { fst :: a, snd :: b} 
data P a b = P {fstP :: !a, sndP :: !b} 
Requirement  There is a unique function
u :: Empty > r 
There is a unique function
u :: r > () 
For any functions
f :: a > r g :: b > r there is a unique function u :: Either a b > r such that: u . Left = f u . Right = g 
For any functions
f :: r > a g :: r > b there is a unique function u :: r > (a,b) such that: fst . u = f snd . u = g 
For any functions
f :: r > a g :: r > b there is a unique function u :: r > P a b such that: fstP . u = f sndP . u = g 
Platonic candidate  u1 r = case r of {} 
u1 _ = () 
u1 (Left a) = f a u1 (Right b) = g b 
u1 r = (f r,g r) 
u1 r = P (f r) (g r) 
Example failure condition  r ~ () 
r ~ () 
r ~ () f _ = () g _ = () 
r ~ () f _ = undefined g _ = undefined 
r ~ () f _ = () g _ = undefined 
Alternative u  u2 _ = () 
u2 _ = undefined 
u2 _ = () 
u2 _ = undefined 

Difference  u1 undefined = undefined u2 undefined = () 
u1 _ = () u2 _ = undefined 
u1 undefined = undefined u2 undefined = () 
u1 _ = (undefined,undefined) u2 _ = undefined 
f _ = () (fstP . u1) _ = undefined 
Result  FAIL  FAIL  FAIL  FAIL  FAIL 
3 "Platonic" Hask
Because of these difficulties, Haskell developers tend to think in some subset of Haskell where types do not have bottom values. This means that it only includes functions that terminate, and typically only finite values. The corresponding category has the expected initial and terminal objects, sums and products, and instances of Functor and Monad really are endofunctors and monads.