# Difference between revisions of "Lambda abstraction"

(eta -> beta plus minor changes) |
BrettGiles (talk | contribs) (Categorize, add infobox.) |
||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

+ | [[Category:Glossary]] |
||

+ | {{Foundations infobox}} |
||

A ''lambda abstraction'' is another name for an [[anonymous function]]. It gets its name from the usual notation for writing it: for example, <math>\lambda x \to x^2</math>. (Another common but equivalent notation is: <math>\lambda x . \ x^2</math>.) |
A ''lambda abstraction'' is another name for an [[anonymous function]]. It gets its name from the usual notation for writing it: for example, <math>\lambda x \to x^2</math>. (Another common but equivalent notation is: <math>\lambda x . \ x^2</math>.) |
||

## Revision as of 18:44, 5 February 2007

A *lambda abstraction* is another name for an anonymous function. It gets its name from the usual notation for writing it: for example, . (Another common but equivalent notation is: .)

In Haskell source code, the Greek letter lambda is replaced by a backslash character ('`\`

') instead, since this is easier to type and requires only the basic 7-bit ASCII character set. Similarly, the arrow is replaced with the much more ugly (but strictly ASCII) character sequence '`->`

'. So, for example, the lambda abstraction above would be written in Haskell as

```
\ x -> x * x
```

There is actually a whole mathematical theory devoted to expressing computation entirely using lambda abstractions: the lambda calculus. Most functional programming languages (including Haskell) are based upon some extension of this idea.

When a lambda abstraction is applied to a value—for instance, —the result of the expression is determined by replacing every free occurrence of the parameter variable (in this case ) with the parameter value (in this case ). This is a beta reduction.