# Difference between revisions of "Memoization"

m (typo (or maybe it should be "it uses"?)) |
MichalPalka (talk | contribs) (→See also: Add draft by Daniel Brown and William R. Cook) |
||

Line 245: | Line 245: | ||

* [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2005-October/011589.html Haskell-Cafe about Memoization and Data.Map] |
* [http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2005-October/011589.html Haskell-Cafe about Memoization and Data.Map] |
||

* http://programming.reddit.com/info/16ofr/comments |
* http://programming.reddit.com/info/16ofr/comments |
||

+ | * [http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~wcook/Drafts/2006/MemoMixins.pdf Monadic Memoization Mixins] by Daniel Brown and William R. Cook |

## Revision as of 21:58, 11 May 2008

**Memoization** is a technique for storing values of a function instead of recomputing them each time the function is called.

## Contents

## Memoization without recursion

You can just write a memoization function using a data structure that is suitable for your application.
We don't go into the details of this case.
If you want a general solution for several types,
you need a type class, say `Memoizable`

.

```
memoize :: Memoizable a => (a->b) -> (a->b)
```

Now, how to implement something like this? Of course, one needs a finite
map that stores values `b`

for keys of type `a`

.
It turns out that such a map can be constructed recursively based on the structure of `a`

:

```
Map () b := b
Map (Either a a') b := (Map a b, Map a' b)
Map (a,a') b := Map a (Map a' b)
```

Here, `Map a b`

is the type of a finite map from keys `a`

to values `b`

.
Its construction is based on the following laws for functions

```
() -> b =~= b
(a + a') -> b =~= (a -> b) x (a' -> b) -- = case analysis
(a x a') -> b =~= a -> (a' -> b) -- = currying
```

For further and detailed explanations, see

- R. Hinze: Memo functions, polytypically!
- R. Hinze: Generalizing generalized tries

## Memoization with recursion

Things become more complicated if the function is recursively defined and it should use memoized calls to itself. A classic example is the recursive computation of Fibonacci numbers.

The naive implementation of Fibonacci numbers without memoization is horribly slow.
Try `slow_fib 30`

, not too much higher than that and it hangs.

```
slow_fib :: Int -> Integer
slow_fib 0 = 0
slow_fib 1 = 1
slow_fib n = slow_fib (n-2) + slow_fib (n-1)
```

The memoized version is much faster.
Try `memoized_fib 10000`

.

```
memoized_fib :: Int -> Integer
memoized_fib =
let fib 0 = 0
fib 1 = 1
fib n = memoized_fib (n-2) + memoized_fib (n-1)
in (map fib [0 ..] !!)
```

### Memoizing fix point operator

You can factor out the memoizing trick to a function, the memoizing fix point operator,
which we will call `memoFix`

here.

```
fib :: (Int -> Integer) -> Int -> Integer
fib f 0 = 1
fib f 1 = 1
fib f n = f (n-1) + f (n-2)
fibonacci :: Int -> Integer
fibonacci = memoFix fib
```

I suppose if you want to "put it in a library",
you should just put `fib`

in,
and allow the user to call `memoFix fib`

to make a new version when necessary.
This allows the user e.g. to define the data structure used for memoization.

The memoising fixpoint operator works by putting the result of the first call of the function for each natural number into a data structure and using that value for subsequent calls ;-)

In general it is

```
memoFix :: ((a -> b) -> (a -> b)) -> a -> b
memoFix f =
let mf = memoize (f mf) in mf
```

## Efficient tree data structure for maps from Int to somewhere

Here we present a special tree data type which is useful as memoizing data structure e.g. for the Fibonacci function.

```
memoizeInt :: (Int -> a) -> (Int -> a)
memoizeInt f = (fmap f (naturals 1 0) !!!)
```

A data structure with a node corresponding to each natural number to use as a memo.

```
data NaturalTree a = Node a (NaturalTree a) (NaturalTree a)
```

Map the nodes to the naturals in this order:

```
```

```
``` 0
1 2
3 5 4 6
7 ...

```
```

Look up the node for a particular number

```
Node a tl tr !!! 0 = a
Node a tl tr !!! n =
if odd n
then tl !!! top
else tr !!! (top-1)
where top = n `div` 2
```

We surely want to be able to map on these things...

```
instance Functor NaturalTree where
fmap f (Node a tl tr) = Node (f a) (fmap f tl) (fmap f tr)
```

If only so that we can write cute,
but inefficient things like the below,
which is just a `NaturalTree`

such that `naturals!!!n == n`

:

```
naturals = Node 0 (fmap ((+1).(*2)) naturals) (fmap ((*2).(+1)) naturals)
```

The following is probably more efficient
(and, having arguments won't hang around at top level, I think)
-- have I put more `$!`

s than necessary?

```
naturals r n =
Node n
((naturals $! r2) $! (n+r))
((naturals $! r2) $! (n+r2))
where r2 = 2*r
```

## Memoising CAFS

**Note: This is migrated from the old wiki.**

Memoising constructor functions gives you HashConsing, and you can sometimes use MemoisingCafs to implement that.

The MemoisingCafs idiom also supports recursion.

Consider, for example:

```
wonderous :: Integer -> Integer
wonderous 1 = 0
wonderous x
| x `mod` 2 == 0 = 1 + wonderous (x `div` 2)
| otherwise = 1 + wonderous (3*x+1)
```

This function is not at all understood by mathematicians and has a surprisingly complex recursion pattern, so if you need to call it many times with different values, optimising it would not be easy.

However, we can memoise some of the domain using an array CAF:

```
wonderous2 :: Integer -> Integer
wonderous2 x
| x <= maxMemo = memoArray ! x
| otherwise = wonderous2' x
where
maxMemo = 100
memoArray = array (1,maxMemo)
[ (x, wonderous2' x) | x <- [1..maxMemo] ]
wonderous2' 1 = 0
wonderous2' x
| x `mod` 2 == 0 = 1 + wonderous2 (x `div` 2)
| otherwise = 1 + wonderous2' (3*x+1)
```

When using this pattern in your own code, note carefully when to call the memoised version (wonderous2 in the above example) and when not to. In general, the partially memoised version (wonderous2' in the above example) should call the memoised version if it needs to perform a recursive call. However, in this instance, we only memoize for small values of x, so the branch of the recursion that passes a larger argument need not bother checking the memo table. (This does slow the array initialization, however.) Thanks to LazyEvaluation, we can even memoise an infinite domain, though we lose constant time lookup. This data structure is O(log N):

```
type MemoTable a = [(Integer, BinTree a)]
data BinTree a = Leaf a | Node Integer (BinTree a) (BinTree a)
wonderous3 :: Integer -> Integer
wonderous3 x
= searchMemoTable x memoTable
where
memoTable :: MemoTable Integer
memoTable = buildMemoTable 1 5
buildMemoTable n i
= (nextn, buildMemoTable' n i) : buildMemoTable nextn (i+1)
where
nextn = n + 2^i
buildMemoTable' base 0
= Leaf (wonderous3' base)
buildMemoTable' base i
= Node (base + midSize)
(buildMemoTable' base (i-1))
(buildMemoTable' (base + midSize) (i-1))
where
midSize = 2 ^ (i-1)
searchMemoTable x ((x',tree):ms)
| x < x' = searchMemoTree x tree
| otherwise = searchMemoTable x ms
searchMemoTree x (Leaf y) = y
searchMemoTree x (Node mid l r)
| x < mid = searchMemoTree x l
| otherwise = searchMemoTree x r
wonderous3' 1 = 0
wonderous3' x
| x `mod` 2 == 0 = 1 + wonderous3 (x `div` 2)
| otherwise = 1 + wonderous3 (3*x+1)
```

Naturally, these techniques can be combined, say, by using a fast CAF data structure for the most common part of the domain and an infinite CAF data structure for the rest.