Difference between revisions of "Name clashes in record fields"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(fix link to haskell prime wiki)
(Using language extension: fix link)
 
Line 32: Line 32:
 
=== Using [[language extension]] ===
 
=== Using [[language extension]] ===
   
<code>[https://downloads.haskell.org/ghc/latest/docs/html/users_guide/glasgow_exts.html#duplicate-record-fields DuplicateRecordFields]</code> extension (GHC 8.0.1+) allow definition of record types with identically-named fields.
+
{{GHCUsersGuide|exts/duplicate_record_fields||a DuplicateRecordFields section}}. The extension (GHC 8.0.1+) allow definition of record types with identically-named fields.
   
 
== See also ==
 
== See also ==

Latest revision as of 20:08, 23 July 2021

Question

error| Multiple declarations of ‘xxx’

I like to define:

data Human = Human {name :: String}
data Dog = Dog {name :: String}

Why is this forbidden?

I like to define:

data Human = Human {name :: String}

name :: Cat -> String
name = ...

Why is this forbidden, too?

Answer

The record field accessors name are just functions that retrieve the field's value from a particular record. They are in the global scope together with top-level functions and thus cannot have the same name. For resolving this you may:

  • rename the accessor or the top-level function
  • put the data declaration or the top-level function in another module and import qualified
  • write a typeclass with a name function and fit the non-accessor function name somehow into that.

Using language extension

The GHC Users Guide has a DuplicateRecordFields section.. The extension (GHC 8.0.1+) allow definition of record types with identically-named fields.

See also