Difference between revisions of "Research papers"

From HaskellWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 31: Line 31:
*[[/Domain specific languages|Domain specific languages]]
*[[/Domain specific languages|Domain specific languages]]
*[[/Functional reactive programming|Functional reactive programming]]
*[[/Functional reactive programming|Functional reactive programming]]
*[[/Functional pearls|Functional pearls: beautiful design]]
== Authors ==
== Authors ==

Revision as of 03:01, 5 May 2007

A lot of documentation exists about Haskell, and its foundations, in the form of research papers written by those investigating language design. An enormous research effort, by hundreds of researchers over the past 20 years, has gone into making Haskell such a great language. In general, if a feature is not well understood, it isn't going to become part of the language.

Here is a selection of those papers, with the goal of making the wealth of material published on Haskell more available to the casual user, and not just researchers. Some of the papers are highly technical, others, not so. These papers are not suitable for those trying to learn the language from scratch, but more for those looking for a deeper understanding of the theoretical and practical aspects of Haskell.


Why Functional Programming Matters
John Hughes. Comput. J. 32(2): 98-107 (1989)
Higher-order + Polymorphic = Reusable
Simon Thompson, 1997.
The History of Haskell
Simon Peyton Jones, Paul Hudak, John Hughes, and Philip Wadler, 2006



Authors Index

Top 10

Most cited Haskell papers

See also haskell.readscheme.org