Difference between revisions of "Talk:Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Uchchwhash (talk | contribs) m (Talk:Curry-Howard isomorphism moved to Talk:Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence) |
Uchchwhash (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Should this page be renamed Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence? Makes a lot more sense that way. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 14:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
Should this page be renamed Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence? Makes a lot more sense that way. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 14:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
: Possibly. Personally, I didn't rename the page as it is seems to be more widely known just as "Curry-Howard" (e.g., wikipedia page is "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry-Howard Curry-Howard]").[[User:BrettGiles|BrettGiles]] 16:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
: Possibly. Personally, I didn't rename the page as it is seems to be more widely known just as "Curry-Howard" (e.g., wikipedia page is "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry-Howard Curry-Howard]").[[User:BrettGiles|BrettGiles]] 16:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
| + | :: Well, who cares. Curry-Howard is not descriptive enough for the special case of Haskell. Curry-Howard is very flexible. Works even for Pascal. Haskell seems more inclined to category theory these days, looks like the third part deserves more attention. --[[User:Uchchwhash|Pirated Dreams]] 06:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:04, 5 November 2006
Should this page be renamed Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence? Makes a lot more sense that way. --Pirated Dreams 14:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Possibly. Personally, I didn't rename the page as it is seems to be more widely known just as "Curry-Howard" (e.g., wikipedia page is "Curry-Howard").BrettGiles 16:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Well, who cares. Curry-Howard is not descriptive enough for the special case of Haskell. Curry-Howard is very flexible. Works even for Pascal. Haskell seems more inclined to category theory these days, looks like the third part deserves more attention. --Pirated Dreams 06:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)