Personal tools

Talk:Questions and answers

From HaskellWiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
1 - When there will be a standard reliable distribution of 'Haskell'?
+
 
    Say GHC? See into documentations and then pay attention to top of the page :
+
    'experimental'. As you see everything is too academic to be real.
+
    Haskell peaople insist that this is a language of choice. I admit that I fell
+
    badly in love! But then I found a girl of the church that does not want to
+
    dance with me and come into my dreams. She is so religious that I think
+
    I am trying to communicate with a ghoust or wourth : a monad.
+
2 - Why Haskell Peaple love to 'EXPLAIN' and hate to show 'HOW'?
+
    I am a programmer
+
    and I am programming as my job. There are a lot of documents there that none
+
    of them has a sample that put it's concept to work?
+
    So why you hate samples? I can not code in concepts and sell them and that
+
    is most important thing.
+
3 - This Monadic plague is driving me crazy! I read documents about it and still
+
    I do not understand it (I admit I am a little slow but this is far from being
+
    grasped as daily concerns in other programming languages.)
+
    So PLEASE somebody put an PRACTICAL end to this ambious thing that bleeds
+
    from inner part of my mind. (I pray !!! God bless you!)
+
    And do not thing we do not need states at all even an electronic cicuit with
+
    solid behaviour has some 'unnatural' - in your oppinion - states like noises
+
    and strange feedbacks.
+
4 - If this is going to be a practical 'THING' in 'INDUSTRY' maybe the other ways
+
    need to be tested. A port of appache http server to haskell, extending
+
    haskell to paralell and distributed space more reliably, better IDEs and
+
    tools, and a little roughness for comming out of the paradise of academia to
+
    the warm climate of daily problem solving challenges.
+
Thanks all for your efforts
+

Revision as of 11:37, 13 July 2006