Talk:Functor-Applicative-Monad Proposal

From HaskellWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


If return is the only method of the Pointed class then Pointed should be included in the hierarchy. Better to be exactly mathematically correct once and for all.

Pure vs. return

When combining pure and return, perhaps we should call it pure, or something else that is not return? It would defy convention, yes, but we would already be making changes that would require a Legacy module for backwards compatability, and it may reduce confusion over what the function actually does, because Haskell's return is nothing like "return" in other languages.